Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 22:55 28 Apr 2024
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Apr (1996)
GNER franchise (Sea Containers) starts on ECML (*)

Train RunningDelayed
19:38 London Paddington to Swansea
19:53 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:44 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
21:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
22:10 Taunton to Bristol Temple Meads
23:03 Reading to Gatwick Airport
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 28, 2024, 23:08:44 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[138] Clan Line - by Clan Line !
[118] Visiting the pub on the way home.
[44] South Western Railways Waterloo - Bristol services axed
[42] access for all at Devon stations report
[27] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[22] Misleading advertising?
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Permitted Route in Kent ??  (Read 6027 times)
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 864



View Profile
« on: June 28, 2019, 11:20:42 »

Could anyone help my daughter please ?  She has a return ticket from Aylesford to Warminster. (Super OP (Original Poster / topic starter) - any permitted route) her usual route is via Strood or Tonbridge to Waterloo East - and on from there.

On the return leg she would like to go to Clapham Jct and then into Victoria. Then take an Ashford train to Maidstone East, (short) walk to Maidstone Barracks and then get the Strood train to Aylesford (next stop). Is this a "Permitted Route" ? Neither of us can get a definitive answer from the Routing Guide !

The reason for this slightly convoluted route is that she wishes to break her journey between Victoria and Maidstone on her way home; rather than go home and have to buy more tickets (and back track) to achieve her aim.

Many thanks.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7172


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2019, 11:50:19 »

I don't think the Routeing Guide says anything about walking legs, so any route with one can't be permitted by the NRG. However, some walking links are shown in the data feeds, so journey planners do show them - but I have never found whatever it is that tells them they should.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40843



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2019, 11:56:55 »

I don't think the Routeing Guide says anything about walking legs, so any route with one can't be permitted by the NRG. However, some walking links are shown in the data feeds, so journey planners do show them - but I have never found whatever it is that tells them they should.

The £71.40 ticket, right?   (Before any railcard discounts).    Same price to Aylesford and to Maidstone STATIONS so she can probably ask at Warminster to excess the ticket to Maidstone stations - that would allow London to East, West or Barracks.  Then just a single back to Aylesford.

Note my use of "probably" - this is an educated guess and should be checked with - well, goodness knows who. Quick trip to Warminster station prior to travel at a none-rush time but when the booking office is open, and showing her natural charm ... and I'm sure it can be fixed.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Fourbee
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 672


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2019, 12:47:12 »

I put "via Otford" into a mixing deck journey planner and it showed the desired journey (in and out of Victoria via Clapham Junction, then the Maidstone walk), but with no tickets available. Not definitive, but a useful start. Maybe grahame's option looks good - replacing Aylesford for Maidstone Stations presented the £71.40 ticket as valid with the same itinerary (minus the walk if that makes sense). Can overdistance excesses (£0.00) in this case be issued to extend the "Origin station end"?

By the way, while poking around I found Maidstone Stations to Salisbury via Barnham Off-Peak return priced at £32.70; I recall Bignosemac extolling the virtues of these Southern priced flows a while back.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7172


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 28, 2019, 12:51:27 »

I've just tried NR» (Network Rail - home page)'s OJP (Online Journey Planner) for that trip, telling it to avoid Paddock Wood. One of the options it comes up with is exactly what you were asking about - and that's as close to being "permitted" as you are likely to get (unless you ask someone and trust them to be definitively right - righter than the OJP).

But (there's always one) that was for a single, not a return, and it's not offering me SOP (Standard Operating Instructions) returns at all. There's no obvious reason, but then the two edit buttons aren't working at the moment either, so maybe it's not well.
Logged
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 864



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 28, 2019, 13:34:42 »

I don't think the Routeing Guide says anything about walking legs, so any route with one can't be permitted by the NRG. However, some walking links are shown in the data feeds, so journey planners do show them - but I have never found whatever it is that tells them they should.

Waterloo East to Waterloo ?     
I just put Aylesford to Barming into Mixing Deck - and that tells me to walk between Maidstone Barracks and Maidstone East.

Just had a text from daughter - the guard on the train from Waterloo "thinks" that it may be a valid route.  He did tell her it was valid to go Westbury/Paddington/HS1 (High Speed line 1 - St Pancras to Channel Tunnel)................but that wasn't the question..
Logged
Trowres
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 756


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 28, 2019, 14:34:05 »

I've just tried NR» (Network Rail - home page)'s OJP (Online Journey Planner) for that trip, telling it to avoid Paddock Wood. One of the options it comes up with is exactly what you were asking about - and that's as close to being "permitted" as you are likely to get (unless you ask someone and trust them to be definitively right - righter than the OJP).

But (there's always one) that was for a single, not a return, and it's not offering me SOP (Standard Operating Instructions) returns at all. There's no obvious reason, but then the two edit buttons aren't working at the moment either, so maybe it's not well.

I think that if the OJP doesn't provide a return fare, it is because it thinks the route is not valid as a through journey; it will offer the route as a combination of singles, but make it very hard to see which combination of singles it is offering.

For this interesting journey, OJP is not offering many valid journeys via any route; everything is via St Pancras but most suggestions are via Salisbury which apparently is not valid.
Logged
jamestheredengine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 302


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 29, 2019, 09:14:19 »

I would suspect that in cases like this where it's patently reasonable, but very difficult to work out whether it is permitted or not, the chances of anyone challenging it on the ground are vanishingly small (even more so, seeing as South Eastern types are unlikely to know where Warminster is).
Logged

stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7172


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 29, 2019, 18:48:30 »

I think that if the OJP (Online Journey Planner) doesn't provide a return fare, it is because it thinks the route is not valid as a through journey; it will offer the route as a combination of singles, but make it very hard to see which combination of singles it is offering.

For this interesting journey, OJP is not offering many valid journeys via any route; everything is via St Pancras but most suggestions are via Salisbury which apparently is not valid.

I think that's mixing up two distinct things. The OJP can cope with two singles as an alternative to a return; it has to for advance fares. That''s why it offers routes for both halves separately, but you choice of the outward fare alters what it offers on the return. In some ways doing research - looking at the offers without making a selection - makes it look confusing. For checking permitted routes and nothing else it's simpler to request a single, but obviously that tells you nothing about timing restrictions. 

When it finds a journey (a sequence of trains) with a route it thinks is not permitted, it puts up that annoying "Multiple Tickets Required for Journey" flag. It doesn't tell you which options that applies to - sometimes there's no price, sometimes there's a price that looks like only part-route, and maybe sometimes it adds the part-route prices. The OJP is a weird and (sometimes) wonderful thing but I wouldn't accuse it of being consistently consistent.

But it's true this example is a complicated one. There are two valid routeing points at each end (so says the NRG's checker), and a total of twenty map combinations plus London routeing.

But to recap - before opening the NRG, any direct service is permitted (there are none), and any route with a lower specific fare (again, none as only Any Permitted fares exist). (You may recall that when discussing walking legs around Farnborough there were fares such as "via Farnborough North".) And the shortest route by track distance is also always permitted, but I wish you fun trying to find it! I guess it's a scenic route across southern England, with many changes, so a lot of work would be needed. That calculation cannot, AFAIK (as far as I know), include walking legs, or else I suspect that Tonbridge/Redhill/Guildford/Farnboroughs/Salisbury might be the one.

The routeing point for Warminster is Salisbury or Westbury, and in both cases the mapped routes are from London, one option from Waterloo and two from Paddington.  Plus there's an oddity running from south wales to Waterloo through Warminster, but listed under Westbury. At the other end the routeing point is Strood or Tonbridge, and again all the options are to London - but there are more possibilities (2 and 4). None of them includes St Pancras, but that is covered under the London routeing. Finally, there can be a third map in the middle, always the one from Waterloo to Reading or Woking.

But with all these possibilities, during off-peak hours most journeys offered use HS1 (High Speed line 1 - St Pancras to Channel Tunnel) - quick and simple. Once timing restrictions kick in, more interesting journeys do come up - seven changes, for example. That's a result of the OJP trying very hard to find an off-peak option at 08:00, and succeeding. But it is odd that so many journeys offered don't match any of the permitted routes.

To return to the original question, forcing that walk at Maidstone gives only multi-ticket quotes, meaning the OJP thinks it's not permitted. But then it's not using either valid routeing point, so it wouldn't be, and I think that rule the OJP does follow.

Logged
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 864



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 29, 2019, 19:45:19 »

Both Warminster and Westbury ticket offices say that route is OK.  We'll see what happens on the train tomorrow........................
Logged
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 864



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 30, 2019, 21:37:13 »

We'll see what happens on the train tomorrow........................

Well................... for a start the 0949 WMN» (Warminster - next trains) to SAL was cancelled .........but the dirty, evil, carbon producing Fiesta came to the rescue when I had to drive her to Salisbury to make her connection. (Yet another delay/repay going in - that's the 4th one in 4 weeks!!)
When she got to Victoria the barrier wouldn't accept her ticket, but the human being did..........no one came round on the train, so her original question still hasn't been definitively answered.
Many thanks for all the comments.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18924



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: June 30, 2019, 22:35:57 »

A definitive answer for (what some might see as) an esoteric routeing? I suspect you'll be waiting a long time.

And that's even if you ask the mysterious beings (I'm not sure they're human) responsible for the National Routeing Guide.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 864



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: June 30, 2019, 23:46:03 »

A definitive answer for (what some might see as) an esoteric routeing? I suspect you'll be waiting a long time.

And that's even if you ask the mysterious beings (I'm not sure they're human) responsible for the National Routeing Guide.

I fear you may be correct with both your statements above  - but is it really an "esoteric routing" if it gets my daughter home 30  mins quicker that the "unesoteric" (?) route ?   Wink
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40843



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #13 on: July 01, 2019, 07:04:05 »

A definitive answer for (what some might see as) an esoteric routeing? I suspect you'll be waiting a long time.

And that's even if you ask the mysterious beings (I'm not sure they're human) responsible for the National Routeing Guide.

I fear you may be correct with both your statements above  - but is it really an "esoteric routing" if it gets my daughter home 30  mins quicker that the "unesoteric" (?) route ?   Wink

Delighted that the journey worked.   The chance of it being challenged was, I suspect pretty close to zero (if your daughter was observed making the same journey on a very frequent basis, someone *might* actually try and check) and on balance of probability (and with all sanity) should be valid.

Sadly, closure is rare on cases such as this with unusual or unique features.  No answer provided for sure for next time the same journey is made, and almost a feeling of disappointment that no-one has taken a look during the journey and said either (a) that's fine or (b) you shouldn't be doing this (because ...)
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 864



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: July 01, 2019, 15:47:47 »

My daughter says she will probably use that route on her way back to Kent from now on. The No 1 "permitted route" includes, Waterloo East to Strood - there are no longer any through trains on this leg - there are now 1, 2 or 3 changes. The 3 change version has as its first leg, Waterloo East to .............Victoria, by tube !!

It is no use to her going the other way as she would be trying to board an already packed Warminster train at Clapham. She will come via Tonbridge still.

Another interesting point she raised last night - if the man at Victoria barrier let her onto the train with her existing ticket, where would she then stand if the on-train man said her ticket wasn't valid ?  (No "definitive answer" required  Grin Grin)
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page