Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:35 02 May 2024
* Spectacular thunderstorms rumble across UK
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/05/24 - BRTA Westbury
22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

On this day
2nd May (1859)
Wilton South station opened

Train RunningCancelled
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:23 London Paddington to Oxford
11:00 Oxford to London Paddington
11:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
06:38 Weymouth to Gloucester
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
07:13 Great Malvern to London Paddington
07:33 Weymouth to Gloucester
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:24 Exmouth to Paignton
09:50 Penzance to Plymouth
10:24 Paignton to Exmouth
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
11:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
Delayed
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 02, 2024, 09:51:03 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[110] Leven, Fife, Scotland, fast forward a month
[106] Vintage film - how valid are these issues today?
[101] Train drivers "overwhelmingly white middle aged men"
[81] Visiting the pub on the way home.
[30] underground plans for Bristol update.
[21] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Garden Villages and Garden Towns: Visions and Reality / Melksham Future  (Read 2373 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40850



View Profile WWW Email
« on: June 16, 2020, 13:27:50 »

Good to see the new Transport for New Homes report making the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page).

The Melksham Neighbourhood Plan is online and Melksham Town Council and Melksham Without Parish Council are consulting on a draft of it for a period of 6 weeks between Monday 1st June - Monday 13th July 2020.   I am posting up here in the TransWilts line board as there is much to be learned from the Transport for New Homes report for Melksham, and I am delighted to see many of the lessons reported by TfNH have arisen in the plan.   Also interesting to see how similar their bus and rail integration logo is to the one that Lisa came up with to represent Option 24/7 a few years ago.



From the report:

Quote
Garden Villages and Garden Towns: Visions and Reality

From Kent to Carlisle, the Government wants to build more than 50 Garden Villages and Garden Towns to help tackle the country’s housing supply crisis.

Garden Communities are envisaged as sociable, green communities, each with a centre that is easily walked to and a transport system built for sustainability.

Our new report, Garden Villages and Garden Towns: Visions and Reality, found that the reality threatens to be very different.

For Melksham:

"Garden Communities are envisaged as sociable, green communities, each with a centre that is easily walked to and a transport system built for sustainability." 

So many of the elements exist and are proposed for plugging together in the neighbourhood plan ... yet we currently have a disjoint public transport system with links and common information missing, and cycling and walking routes that are good in parts but then come to an end spilling major cycling flows onto "A" class roads between barriers, and with waymarking is some key places notable by its absence.

The neighbourhood plan is full of good intent. But the pictures in the TfNH report illustrating how it really should not be look exactly as if they could have been taken in certain Melksham locations built invert recent years.  We need to make sure that the neighbourhood plan prevails - the irony being that if it does, it will be for the good of the developers making for very much more saleable houses with excellent links to the town on cycle and foot, and an integrated public transport network fit for the health, climate and future.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1947


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 17, 2020, 06:55:25 »

Melksham might be in a minority. Long Marston doesn't exactly get rave reviews. Grazeley Garden Village also doesn't appear to come up smelling of roses. Grazeley was marked in the map as Basingstoke Hampshire, which I imagine could offend some politics.
Logged
ray951
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 462


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 17, 2020, 09:50:57 »

Didcot is a 'Garden Town', and we have had lots of fancy brochures and promises.

But the only thing either delivered or planned are 1000's of houses, I have seen no plans (as in planning permission applied for) for any of the promised infrastucture improvements.

There is apparently a pot of money set aside for some of these infrastucture improvements but this money wasn't automatic as it had to be applied for even though we are still getting the 1000's of houses, and I am not convinced we will ever see it.

As far as i can tell the whole thing is just a load of marketing spin.

As an aside when I received the Garden Town Brochure I had to point out to the council/publisher that Didcot was on the GWML (Great Western Main Line) and not the WCML (West Coast Main Line), an easy mistake to make! With such basic errors it didn't give me any reassurance that this was a quality well thought out document or that I could believe its promises.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page