Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:35 26 Apr 2024
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
26th Apr (2016)
DOO strikes start on Southern (link)

Train RunningShort Run
20:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 26, 2024, 21:41:24 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[141] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[73] access for all at Devon stations report
[47] Who we are - the people behind firstgreatwestern.info
[17] Bonaparte's at Bristol Temple Meads
[3] Lack of rolling stock due to attacks on shipping in the Red Se...
[2] Cornish delays
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: Add a fourth to these groups of three - Coffee Shop Only Connect?  (Read 2801 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40833



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #30 on: October 31, 2020, 20:25:15 »

Eight groups of three with something in common.  Rather than tell me what the common feature is, can you name a further member or members of the same group?

Lots of answers - hard one to 'mark' as there are so many potential commonalities. Let me fill in what I had in mind.

1. Newquay, Whitby, Stranraer
Stations where the remaining line in not the one that would have been expected pre-1960s.
Blackpool North is another. Severn Beach a very interesting suggestion - line in from Pilning would have been better than Avonmouth?

2. Avoncliff, Wolverton, Alvechurch
Stations with good waterway / canal connections
Chirk is good ... and has others have said, there are many.  Personal favourite (personal experience) - Hatton

3. Cardiff, Haymarket, King's Cross
Stations with a platform 0
Yes, Redhill ... and there are a number of others.

4. Aberdovey, Copplestone, Exeter St Thomas
Stations with Harrington Humps.
Harrington  Grin ... Yes, Ferryside, Abedovey an about 85 more

5. Ryde, St Budeaux, Catford
Places with multiple stations.
Helensburugh, Tyndrum, Coatbridge, Wigan, Windsor ...

6. Pilning, Teeside Airport, Brigg
Stations with services on just one day per week
Kirton Lindsey, Reddish South, Denton

7. Shalford, St Ives, Paddington
Stations who's name in the official National Rail Stats differ from the boards on the station
Swindon, St James Park ... (officially Swindon (Wilts) and St James' Park (Exeter) )
Three given originally Shalford (Surrey), St Ives (Cornwall) and London Paddington.

8. Melksham, San Juan Capistrano, Dunlop
Stations that closed in 1966 but have reopened as part of a national network since
Conwy, Llanfairpwll, Corby
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
JontyMort
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 342


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: October 31, 2020, 21:09:43 »

Eight groups of three with something in common.  Rather than tell me what the common feature is, can you name a further member or members of the same group?

Lots of answers - hard one to 'mark' as there are so many potential commonalities. Let me fill in what I had in mind.

2. Avoncliff, Wolverton, Alvechurch
Stations with good waterway / canal connections
Chirk is good ... and has others have said, there are many.  Personal favourite (personal experience) - Hatton


But, Graham, your answer isn?t as specific as my additional ones. All of your original three - Avoncliff, Wolverton, Alvechurch - have not merely canals but aqueducts. Hence my offering Chirk and Wootton Wawen, and being doubtful about Falkirk - though the southern approach to the wheel  sort of counts as one.

Hatton has lovely locks but no aqueduct.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40833



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #32 on: November 01, 2020, 05:59:19 »

But, Graham, your answer isn?t as specific as my additional ones. All of your original thre - Avoncliff, Wolverton, Alvechurch - have not merely canals but aqueducts. Hence my offering Chirk and Wootton Wawen, and being doubtful about Falkirk - though the southern approach to the wheel  sort of counts as one.

Hatton has lovely locks but no aqueduct.

Indeed you found a far closer connection within mine than I had intended - excellent work; my summary last night dropped back to the original connections I had, which was canal connections very close indeed to stations.   The Falkirk wheel and approach aqueduct are fascinating ... I've been there, seen it in action ... not travelled on it.

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7170


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: November 01, 2020, 10:15:29 »

But, Graham, your answer isn?t as specific as my additional ones. All of your original thre - Avoncliff, Wolverton, Alvechurch - have not merely canals but aqueducts. Hence my offering Chirk and Wootton Wawen, and being doubtful about Falkirk - though the southern approach to the wheel  sort of counts as one.

Hatton has lovely locks but no aqueduct.

Indeed you found a far closer connection within mine than I had intended - excellent work; my summary last night dropped back to the original connections I had, which was canal connections very close indeed to stations.   The Falkirk wheel and approach aqueduct are fascinating ... I've been there, seen it in action ... not travelled on it.

Ah, but ... I did think of aqueducts, based on Avoncliff, and rejected the idea as other other two didn't have one anywhere nearby. Canals do have quite frequent aqueducts, so finding one a mile or two away isn't surprising. And from Wolverton station, the aqueduct is over a mile (at Alvechurch, just under). And it's not even a name thing - the one (not very) near Wolverton is named after Cosgrove!

As to whether a waterway just over the wall from a station is a "good connection", you'd probably have to try it.
Logged
JontyMort
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 342


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: November 01, 2020, 11:02:47 »

But, Graham, your answer isn?t as specific as my additional ones. All of your original thre - Avoncliff, Wolverton, Alvechurch - have not merely canals but aqueducts. Hence my offering Chirk and Wootton Wawen, and being doubtful about Falkirk - though the southern approach to the wheel  sort of counts as one.

Hatton has lovely locks but no aqueduct.

Indeed you found a far closer connection within mine than I had intended - excellent work; my summary last night dropped back to the original connections I had, which was canal connections very close indeed to stations.   The Falkirk wheel and approach aqueduct are fascinating ... I've been there, seen it in action ... not travelled on it.



Same here - my wife was sufficiently thrilled by the diversion to the wheel to suggest that I might be pushing my luck.
Logged
JontyMort
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 342


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: November 01, 2020, 11:15:38 »

But, Graham, your answer isn?t as specific as my additional ones. All of your original thre - Avoncliff, Wolverton, Alvechurch - have not merely canals but aqueducts. Hence my offering Chirk and Wootton Wawen, and being doubtful about Falkirk - though the southern approach to the wheel  sort of counts as one.

Hatton has lovely locks but no aqueduct.

Indeed you found a far closer connection within mine than I had intended - excellent work; my summary last night dropped back to the original connections I had, which was canal connections very close indeed to stations.   The Falkirk wheel and approach aqueduct are fascinating ... I've been there, seen it in action ... not travelled on it.

Ah, but ... I did think of aqueducts, based on Avoncliff, and rejected the idea as other other two didn't have one anywhere nearby. Canals do have quite frequent aqueducts, so finding one a mile or two away isn't surprising. And from Wolverton station, the aqueduct is over a mile (at Alvechurch, just under). And it's not even a name thing - the one (not very) near Wolverton is named after Cosgrove!

As to whether a waterway just over the wall from a station is a "good connection", you'd probably have to try it.

Yes, I agree that Cosgrove is the correct name - though Wolverton gets used also. As to ?just over the wall? there are quite a few but University and Bournville spring to mind.

As to a good connection, I have on several occasions joined or left boating jaunts by train in mid-jaunt. Pewsey was one, and a very late night walk from Cheddington to the Grand Union after a wedding was another.

And come to think of it, Warwick Parkway is a good way to summon reinforcements for the Hatton 21...
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40833



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #36 on: November 01, 2020, 11:18:19 »

As to whether a waterway just over the wall from a station is a "good connection", you'd probably have to try it.

Indeed.  On all three I quoted I have, personally, done it ... as I have at Chirk which was the first extra location suggested.  And Hatton and Banbury.  Wolverton has especially romantic memories.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40833



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #37 on: November 01, 2020, 12:19:17 »

As to a good connection, I have on several occasions joined or left boating jaunts by train in mid-jaunt. Pewsey was one, and a very late night walk from Cheddington to the Grand Union after a wedding was another.

THAT, as I recall, is quite a walk.   The railway goes through Tring cutting and the canal does a big loop via Marsworth where the Aylesbury Arm branches off down a flight of narrow locks.   Fond memories.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
rogerw
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1343



View Profile
« Reply #38 on: November 01, 2020, 12:41:45 »

To 8 you could also add Templecombe, Feniton(was Sidmouth Junction), Pinhoe and Ivybridge
Logged

I like to travel.  It lets me feel I'm getting somewhere.
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5219


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: November 01, 2020, 12:42:38 »

Severn Beach a very interesting suggestion - line in from Pilning would have been better than Avonmouth?

It's an interesting quirk that the Engineers' Line Reference for the Severn Beach line is CNX (CliftoN eXtension) from Narroways Jct to Avonmouth Jct, with mileages measured from the Narroways end; after Avonmouth Jct it becomes AMB (AvonMouth Branch) with mileages measured from the Pilning end. It does all get a bit complicated in Avonmouth, what with the Henbury line (AFR: Avonmouth and Filton Railway) and the dock sidings.

So I'm not sure which is 'better', but it does look like there was a time when, operationally at least, Severn Beach looked north rather than south.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40833



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #40 on: November 01, 2020, 13:02:12 »

To 8 you could also add Templecombe, Feniton(was Sidmouth Junction), Pinhoe and Ivybridge

Pinhoe, yes.  Templecombe, Yes.  Ivybridge closed in 1965 and Sidmouth Junction in 1967 though - at least according to WikiPedia
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page