Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 05:15 29 Apr 2024
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Apr (1973)
Patent award for Janney (Buckeye) coupling (*)

Train RunningShort Run
09:23 London Paddington to Oxford
14:02 Oxford to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 29, 2024, 05:28:00 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[121] Visiting the pub on the way home.
[98] Clan Line - by Clan Line !
[25] South Western Railways Waterloo - Bristol services axed
[24] access for all at Devon stations report
[15] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[12] Misleading advertising?
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: "Taking photos is against the law" London Waterloo, July 2022.  (Read 1285 times)
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18924



View Profile
« on: July 10, 2022, 12:04:35 »

My day out riding the rails a couple of days ago was clouded somewhat by unwanted interactions with agency security staff at London Waterloo.

On arrival I went up onto the mezzanine to grab a coffee. Opposite the cafe there is a great stained glass window flanked by friezes, with the London & South Western Railway crest. That'll be a nice photo I thought.

While composing my shot, checking settings and waiting for a cleaner to move from the window, I was approached by a security officer from SES Group. Her opening gambit was, "You can't take photos here."

"Why not?" I asked.
"It's against the law."
"What law?"

She couldn't really articulate an answer to that, except to say it was for security reasons. I suggested she call BTP (British Transport Police) if she had a reasonable belief I was a security threat. At this point two PCSOs happened to be approaching so I went up to them to ask if I was breaking the law by taking photos of an architectural feature of the station. After a little to and fro with them mentioning irrelevant things such as photographing CCTV (Closed Circuit Tele Vision) (I wasn't), voyeurism(!), and photographing people without their consent (incidentally, not illegal in public), they agreed I was doing nothing wrong. I asked them to tell the security officer she was wrong to say what I was doing was illegal. To their credit they apologised to me. She didn't.

After my coffee, and with time to spare before my train from Waterloo East to Abbey Wood, I went for a stroll along the concourse. Up by the former International platforms is a new statue, commemorating the 'Windrush Generation'. Out comes my phone again to take some pictures. Another SES Group officer approaches and tells me I can't take pictures on the station. A similar conversation ensues about security and the law.

Once again I'm forced to explain I'm doing nothing illegal. There is no statute law or railway byelaw that prevents me taking photos on a station. At worst, Network Rail would like you to make your presence known at the large stations they manage, but that's only a courtesy, and doesn't really apply in this case as I was merely passing time between trains. Different to being there for the express purpose of photography.

I ask this second jobsworth why he's asked me to stop taking pictures and not the half dozen other folk around the statue snapping away with their phones. He decides to loudly ask everyone to stop! Unbelievable behaviour.

I see the same two PCSOs in the distance and return to them to tell pf this latest interaction with the security goons. All they can suggest is I complain to Network Rail.

So, off I went to the station reception. Again, some needless 'justification' from the NR» (Network Rail - home page) Supervisor about terrorism. But I eventually have him agreeing that snaps of architecture and statues while passing through are neither a security risk nor require 'signing in' with NR.

Formal complaints made in writing to Network Rail and SES Group. One ill-informed security officer is bad enough. Two shows at best a lack of training, or at worst incorrect training.

My 'illegal' pictures:



Absolutely unforgivable behaviour on my part. Lock me up. Throw away the key!  Shocked Roll Eyes
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Ralph Ayres
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 338


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 10, 2022, 15:47:17 »

I'd like to see them try to stop photography at Kings Cross!  The luggage trolley disappearing into the wall on "platform 9 3/4" is deliberately set up for that very purpose.
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1538



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 10, 2022, 16:17:00 »

This could be a grave threat to our favourite "where was I today quizzes" ........
Logged
patch38
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 653


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 10, 2022, 16:21:14 »

This could be a grave threat to our favourite "where was I today quizzes" ........

Where was I today?

A. Wormwood Scrubs

B. Belmarsh

C. Dartmoor
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4362


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: July 10, 2022, 20:53:20 »

My day out riding the rails a couple of days ago was clouded somewhat by unwanted interactions with agency security staff at London Waterloo.

On arrival I went up onto the mezzanine to grab a coffee. Opposite the cafe there is a great stained glass window flanked by friezes, with the London & South Western Railway crest. That'll be a nice photo I thought.

While composing my shot, checking settings and waiting for a cleaner to move from the window, I was approached by a security officer from SES Group. Her opening gambit was, "You can't take photos here."

"Why not?" I asked.
"It's against the law."
"What law?"

She couldn't really articulate an answer to that, except to say it was for security reasons. I suggested she call BTP (British Transport Police) if she had a reasonable belief I was a security threat. At this point two PCSOs happened to be approaching so I went up to them to ask if I was breaking the law by taking photos of an architectural feature of the station. After a little to and fro with them mentioning irrelevant things such as photographing CCTV (Closed Circuit Tele Vision) (I wasn't), voyeurism(!), and photographing people without their consent (incidentally, not illegal in public), they agreed I was doing nothing wrong. I asked them to tell the security officer she was wrong to say what I was doing was illegal. To their credit they apologised to me. She didn't.

After my coffee, and with time to spare before my train from Waterloo East to Abbey Wood, I went for a stroll along the concourse. Up by the former International platforms is a new statue, commemorating the 'Windrush Generation'. Out comes my phone again to take some pictures. Another SES Group officer approaches and tells me I can't take pictures on the station. A similar conversation ensues about security and the law.

Once again I'm forced to explain I'm doing nothing illegal. There is no statute law or railway byelaw that prevents me taking photos on a station. At worst, Network Rail would like you to make your presence known at the large stations they manage, but that's only a courtesy, and doesn't really apply in this case as I was merely passing time between trains. Different to being there for the express purpose of photography.

I ask this second jobsworth why he's asked me to stop taking pictures and not the half dozen other folk around the statue snapping away with their phones. He decides to loudly ask everyone to stop! Unbelievable behaviour.

I see the same two PCSOs in the distance and return to them to tell pf this latest interaction with the security goons. All they can suggest is I complain to Network Rail.

So, off I went to the station reception. Again, some needless 'justification' from the NR» (Network Rail - home page) Supervisor about terrorism. But I eventually have him agreeing that snaps of architecture and statues while passing through are neither a security risk nor require 'signing in' with NR.

Formal complaints made in writing to Network Rail and SES Group. One ill-informed security officer is bad enough. Two shows at best a lack of training, or at worst incorrect training.

My 'illegal' pictures:



Absolutely unforgivable behaviour on my part. Lock me up. Throw away the key!  Shocked Roll Eyes

In future suggest they read the Network Rail Guidelines on Photography https://www.networkrail.co.uk/communities/railway-enthusiasts/guidelines-for-taking-photos-at-stations/

Even perhaps have the webpage saved in your phone
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1942


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: July 11, 2022, 06:56:31 »

This all to common nowadays, apart from on the railway; Swindon outlet, Reading Oracle, Portsmouth Gunwharf Quays spring to mind.
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: July 11, 2022, 08:20:05 »

In future suggest they read the Network Rail Guidelines on Photography https://www.networkrail.co.uk/communities/railway-enthusiasts/guidelines-for-taking-photos-at-stations/

Even perhaps have the webpage saved in your phone
Glad I read that, thanks for linking. The point about flash photography is obvious once made but I probably wouldn't have thought of it otherwise.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40843



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #7 on: July 11, 2022, 08:34:13 »

In future suggest they read the Network Rail Guidelines on Photography https://www.networkrail.co.uk/communities/railway-enthusiasts/guidelines-for-taking-photos-at-stations/

Even perhaps have the webpage saved in your phone

I have mirrored the page at http://www.passenger.chat/photos - which is dated 2022

In case of panic, the URL also works for "photo", "photograph","photographs" and "photography" and is case insensitive!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Witham Bobby
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 568



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: July 11, 2022, 10:27:52 »

Ill informed, or clueless security personnel are a menace.  Time spent arguing with you could have been much better spent, I'm sure.  Give some people a teeny bit of authority, and watch them take a mile
Logged
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 864



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: July 11, 2022, 11:27:02 »

Ill informed, or clueless security personnel are a menace.  Time spent arguing with you could have been much better spent, I'm sure.  Give some people a teeny bit of authority, and watch them take a mile

Best bet is to inform them, politely, that you are acting within the Law and carry on........................see what they do then ! Any physical attempt to interfere with what you are doing is common assault. IF they do call a real (Police) "Officer" - he would undoubtedly explain the Law to them  Smiley
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5413



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: July 12, 2022, 15:52:38 »

Ill informed, or clueless security personnel are a menace.  Time spent arguing with you could have been much better spent, I'm sure.  Give some people a teeny bit of authority, and watch them take a mile

Best bet is to inform them, politely, that you are acting within the Law and carry on........................see what they do then ! Any physical attempt to interfere with what you are doing is common assault. IF they do call a real (Police) "Officer" - he would undoubtedly explain the Law to them  Smiley

I would not count on even proper police officers correctly applying the law.
I have observed several cases of police officers "over interpreting" the law.
 
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Godfrey Tables
Full Member
***
Posts: 50


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: July 12, 2022, 16:39:36 »

This might be of interest:

A barrister discusses - Can You Take Photographs In Public? Can You Film In Public?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZ5d7TVNYUs&t=301s&ab_channel=BlackBeltBarrister
Logged
Sixty3Closure
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 501


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: July 13, 2022, 15:18:11 »

https://www.networkrail.co.uk/communities/railway-enthusiasts/guidelines-for-taking-photos-at-stations/

When I worked as a producer for a UK (United Kingdom) Broadcaster we always had to get a permit to film at the station which was normally turned down by the press office. It use to be why you saw so many interviews by the entrance. I was never sure what bylaw I was breaking but as an inexperienced producer the first few times I told the camera crew ( in the days before it was one person) that we were entitled to film and they just quietly sighed, probably made a note to avoid any future items I was setting up, and waited for the police to eject us.

Anti terrorism was the most often mentioned reason for not allowing filming although I suspect it was Railtrack being paranoid about the media.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page