Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 10:35 27 Apr 2024
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

No 'On This Day' events reported for 27th Apr

Train RunningCancelled
10:24 Bristol Parkway to London Paddington
10:36 St Ives to St Erth
27/04/24 12:01 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
13:22 St Erth to St Ives
13:36 St Ives to St Erth
27/04/24 13:51 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
13:52 St Erth to St Ives
14:06 St Ives to St Erth
Short Run
07:33 Weymouth to Gloucester
08:51 Penzance to Cardiff Central
27/04/24 10:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
27/04/24 11:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
12:02 Westbury to Gloucester
27/04/24 12:49 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
14:02 Westbury to Gloucester
14:10 Gloucester to Frome
27/04/24 14:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
14:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
27/04/24 15:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
17:43 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
18:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
19:13 Salisbury to Worcester Shrub Hill
Delayed
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 20:57 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 27, 2024, 10:54:38 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[97] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[50] access for all at Devon stations report
[32] Who we are - the people behind firstgreatwestern.info
[11] Bonaparte's at Bristol Temple Meads
[2] Lack of rolling stock due to attacks on shipping in the Red Se...
[1] Cornish delays
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: AMBER CHANGES TO DOUBLE AMBER  (Read 2673 times)
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« on: June 17, 2008, 19:05:34 »

The CLUG have finally updated their website. Roll Eyes Here is what they have to say.

Quote
AMBER CHANGES TO DOUBLE AMBER.
Way back in 1971, British Rail decided that the service over the Oxford to Worcester line could easily be provided on predominantly single track.  The sections between Wolvercot Junction (near Oxford) and Ascott-under-Wychwood, Moreton-in-Marsh and Evesham and Evesham and Norton Junction (near Worcester) had one track and all intermediate signalling removed.   During the period since 1971, there has been an unprecedented growth in demand for travel over the line, with the result that we now have twice as many trains trying to share the reduced amount of infrastructure.

Ever since the Cotswold Line Promotion Group was formed in 1978, it has been pressing for the reinstatement of at least some of the track removed in 1971, but successive operators have never seen a need to spend the necessary money.  The failure to address this problem has resulted in serious operating difficulties over the route, with knock on delays or even cancellations caused particularly by late running trains. The Group would like to see an hourly off-peak service throughout the day, but, although technically possible, this could compromise punctuality and reliability, given the present infrastructure arrangement.

It was announced at a public meeting in Charlbury on 4th April that Network Rail has now submitted proposals to the Office of Rail Regulation for the re-doubling of the 15 mile single line section between Evesham and Moreton-in-Marsh together with some 5 miles of the Ascott-under-Wychwood to Wolvercot Junction single line to a point a mile or so east of Charlbury.

If implemented, this would just leave two single track sections between Oxford and Worcester, both some 8 to 9 miles in length and would considerably improve the flexibility of the route.

On 5th June 2008, the Office of Rail Regulation released a 374 page document entitled "Periodic Review 2008: Draft Determinations".  Within its pages, Cotswold Line Re-doubling is given a high priority, although the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) feels that it could be done for ^3M less than the ^51M costed by Network Rail.

As the CLPG» (Cotswold Line Promotion Group - about) understands it, the scheme still has to receive the final approval of the Secretary of State for Transport.  If this is received, then it is understood that the work will be done in two phases.  Phase 1 will be from Ascott-under-Wychwood to about a mile east of Charlbury.  Phase 2 will be Moreton-in-Marsh to Evesham.  Work on Phase 1 could start as early as January 2009 and, hopefully, be completed in time for the May 2009 timetable changes.

What do people think of the term AMBER CHANGES TO DOUBLE AMBER, is it sensible and safe, or an understatement? Huh

But whatever colour, its great news! Grin
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 17, 2008, 19:07:37 »

A thought - shame "phase 1" is not the long section!
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 17, 2008, 19:22:07 »

Thought this appears to be the reverse of the phasing I had ben told about, if it is phase 1, it's because it's the straightforward section - little track slewing to deal with, except around Charlbury station - and it would provide extra flexibility for any shuttle services out to Moreton during the closure of the section to Evesham.

Double amber is a perfectly reasonable note of caution - as I said in the other thread, the whole Network Rail business plan won't get signed off until October. Yes, the scheme is in there now, it's highly unlikely it would get removed, but until the ink is dry on the paperwork, a fair enough view.
Logged
TerminalJunkie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 919



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 17, 2008, 22:06:58 »

Quote from: willc
Double amber is a perfectly reasonable note of caution
But railway signals are yellow, not amber...
Logged

Daily Mail and Daily Express readers please click here.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page