Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 03:35 30 Apr 2024
- Power cut causes disruption at Stansted Airport
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
30th Apr (1972)
Brighton Belle withdrawn (link)

Train RunningShort Run
06:00 Bedwyn to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 30, 2024, 03:44:28 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[120] Where was I today, 29.04.24?
[90] Clan Line - by Clan Line !
[77] South Western Railways Waterloo - Bristol services axed
[76] Saturdays: Rochdale / Manchester onto the Settle and Carlisle
[56] Broadgage unwell.
[49] Newcomers start here ... and a reference for older hands
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 12
  Print  
Author Topic: New railway stations proposed for Cranbrook, Newcourt and Marsh Barton (merged topic)  (Read 143643 times)
signalandtelegraph
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 300



View Profile
« Reply #30 on: January 02, 2010, 18:42:02 »

Is going to be provided as part of the 'new town' of Cranbrook - currently on hold.  No co-ordination with other schemes on the line but this loop would allow the county councils aspirational half hourly service to Axminster.

http://www.eastdevon.gov.uk/index/planning_services/major_planning_projects/new_community
« Last Edit: January 02, 2010, 19:06:15 by signalandtelegraph » Logged

Bring back BR (British Rail(ways))
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #31 on: January 02, 2010, 19:30:53 »

allow the county councils aspirational half hourly service to Axminster.



Blimey thats a bit optimistic. It doesn't really require that level of service, if anywhere in Devon needs it, then it is between Paignton and Exeter.
Logged
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #32 on: January 02, 2010, 20:06:42 »

you say that because you live there... however i agree hourly at axminster is an amazing level of service and doesnt need improvement at this time apart from at peak times
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5319


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: January 02, 2010, 20:21:18 »

Not sure if that planning website is up to date, it doesn't seem to have changed for a couple of years IIRC (if I recall/remember/read correctly). I think the report Chafford1 mentions is much more recent.

Does anyone know what the expected mileage is for Cranbrook, and is it very close to Feniton or Whimple - might either see a reduced service?  I've seen reports that the current timetable allows for the additional stops, but just how close are the existing stations?

Edit: found a map, seems much further west than I thought, seems like it isn't far from the site of the closed Broadclyst station. Maybe an extension of the double section out of Exeter will be the best solution?

Paul
« Last Edit: January 02, 2010, 20:35:25 by paul7755 » Logged
FlyingDutchman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 137


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: January 02, 2010, 23:36:06 »

Pinhoe don't have enough trains stopping at it now.

I see the Government want to build another new town on some where near cranbrook.

Guy
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #35 on: January 03, 2010, 00:02:57 »

Pinhoe don't have enough trains stopping at it now.

1tp2h as it was before the timetable changed!
Logged
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #36 on: January 03, 2010, 00:10:40 »

pinhoe is well served! ok i favor the west of england line but its had its upgrade and hourly plus nice trains plus well looked after platforms cheeper fairs direct service to london.... you can get greedy you know besides digby and sowton aint a million miles away
Logged
Chafford1
Full Member
***
Posts: 86


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: January 03, 2010, 10:19:16 »

The report from July 2009 confirmed the go-ahead for Cranbrook from March 2010:

http://www.thisisdevon.co.uk/news/Business-leaders-welcome-12m-Cranbrook-boost/article-1196879-detail/article.html

Further track enhancements would be a good idea - you could then have an Axminster - St Davids stopping service and accelerate the Waterloo - Exeter services by removing all the stops west of Honiton.
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #38 on: January 03, 2010, 13:04:15 »

Though that's for the start of development. I would have thought the station would be a couple of years away, as typically provision of a station waits until a reasonable population is in place to use it. 
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5319


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: January 03, 2010, 16:02:18 »

The report from July 2009 confirmed the go-ahead for Cranbrook from March 2010:

http://www.thisisdevon.co.uk/news/Business-leaders-welcome-12m-Cranbrook-boost/article-1196879-detail/article.html

Thanks for the link. However, I don't see it stating for certain that the ^12M includes the new station. It talks about a road leading to the new station though...

Quote
The ^12 million investment includes ^3 million towards a ^10 million Clyst Honiton bypass, ^4 million for the main road serving the first phase of Cranbrook and linking to its new railway station, and ^5 million towards a new primary school serving Cranbrook.

I'm not convinced that Cranbrook station on its own actually needs any track alterations. It is so close to Pinhoe that if it ever required a half hourly service to/from Exeter this could be done in between the hourly services, ie reversing at Cranbrook.  So any future half hourly service on the line further east would have to be assessed on its own merits, and presumably Devon CC would have to stump up more cash.
Another point in the article is the 'freight terminal'.  The Cranbrook plans describe this as an intermodal terminal and place it just west of the new town, and if it is rail connected, and on the current single track it could also be a timetabling issue.  Would they be seriously thinking about running freight along the West of England line, or bringing it from the Exeter direction? Undecided

Paul
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #40 on: January 03, 2010, 16:56:48 »

Further track enhancements would be a good idea - you could then have an Axminster - St Davids stopping service and accelerate the Waterloo - Exeter services by removing all the stops west of Honiton.

Surely any extra stock magiced in* to run this new service would be put to better use running SWT (South West Trains) to Plymouth and Paignton again?

*and the other issue, where from?
Logged
FlyingDutchman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 137


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: January 03, 2010, 19:14:00 »


exeter new intermodal known as Exeter Gateway

http://www.eastdevon.gov.uk/intermodal_facility

http://www.exetersciencepark.co.uk/overview.php

Guy
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5319


View Profile
« Reply #42 on: January 03, 2010, 19:34:57 »

Surely any extra stock magiced in* to run this new service would be put to better use running SWT (South West Trains) to Plymouth and Paignton again?

*and the other issue, where from?

West of Exeter won't be reinstated, now that FGW (First Great Western) are funded to provide the services.

SWT though, they'd only need one unit for a potential Exeter to Cranbrook extra service, it's only about 10 minutes running time.

That could come from quite a few different sources, in no particular order:
return of the EMT» (East Midlands Trains - about) loan unit,
return of the FGW loan unit,
An EMU (Electric Multiple Unit) vice the Lymington DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit),
An EMU vice various Hants local services,
Higher utilisation of the 158 fleet.

Paul
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #43 on: January 03, 2010, 19:42:25 »

I'll pick:

EMU (Electric Multiple Unit) vice DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) on Lymington please! And I don't care if it is a Desiro vice slammer!
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5319


View Profile
« Reply #44 on: January 03, 2010, 19:45:57 »

I'll pick:

EMU (Electric Multiple Unit) vice DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) on Lymington please! And I don't care if it is a Desiro vice slammer!

I concur...

Paul
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 12
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page