Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 00:15 29 Apr 2024
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Apr (1973)
Patent award for Janney (Buckeye) coupling (*)

Train RunningDelayed
23:03 Reading to Gatwick Airport
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 29, 2024, 00:27:12 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[101] Clan Line - by Clan Line !
[87] Visiting the pub on the way home.
[32] South Western Railways Waterloo - Bristol services axed
[31] access for all at Devon stations report
[19] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[16] Misleading advertising?
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: Brighton to Plymouth Service - could it be reinstated?  (Read 13200 times)
plejaren
Full Member
***
Posts: 47


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: April 17, 2009, 08:59:09 »

 yes but what i meant was with the exception of the portsmouth trains and the cardiff one which only runs 2 or 3 times a day, there isnt that connection to the midlands or the north

you have to inconveninatly (underground and all) , change in london
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #16 on: April 17, 2009, 09:43:23 »

The elephant in the room that nobody mentions is electrification or lack of it.

Thus all the services proposed from the West to Brighton and perhaps further East have to be DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) because the juice runs out at Southampton. Not quite as stupid as the as the Basingstoke Norwich service which had to be 170s for lack of conductor rail for about a mile  around Kew.

The only way to get such services is to press for basically every line South of the FGW (First Great Western)
Berks and Hants line to be electrified probably third rail.

Thus Ashford International to Exeter would be a possiblity. Once the GWML (Great Western Main Line) is electrified to Bristol then Salisbury Bristol should be 25KV, to give Brighton Bristol all electric with dual voltage units. Dual voltage with modern electronics is a doddle look at the 350/450 and the Southern Electrostars? Which do Croydon Watford.

As others have said until there are new spare DMUs such services are a bit of pipedream, and the likelihood of their being spare units even with new build which are basically to relieve existing overcrowding is unlikely expecialy if the 14Xs are withdrawn or more likely become so unreliable nobody will let them out of the depot.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: April 17, 2009, 13:21:49 »

The elephant in the room that nobody mentions is electrification or lack of it.

As others have said until there are new spare DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) such services are a bit of pipedream, and the likelihood of their being spare units even with new build which are basically to relieve existing overcrowding is unlikely expecialy if the 14Xs are withdrawn or more likely become so unreliable nobody will let them out of the depot.

The availability of dual voltage electric rolling stock will increase markedly as Thameslink proceeds towards its final condition, with well over 1000 brand new vehicles in 8 or 12 car fixed formation. So being an optimist, the infill electrification will be needed so as to avoid units like 319s being scrapped 10-15 years early. Another key change is that Thameslink KO2 doesn't really introduce new routes, it absorbs existing Southern, Southeastern, and FCC (First Capital Connect)/GN routes into Thameslink, and will displace hundreds of 'mid-life' units from their existing electrified routes.

So I think Basingstoke - Salisbury - Exeter and Salisbury - Southampton/Eastleigh will be obvious solutions to soak up rolling stock, AC or Dc doesn't really matter as much of the stock can be made dual voltage even if not already.  The SWT (South West Trains) 158s and 159s, and then the SN Turbostars should be snapped up elsewhere, such as Norwich - Liverpool, especially if run as 6 or 9 car sets like Waterloo Salisbury etc...

Paul
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: April 17, 2009, 13:37:29 »

yes but what i meant was with the exception of the portsmouth trains and the cardiff one which only runs 2 or 3 times a day, there isnt that connection to the midlands or the north

you have to inconveninatly (underground and all) , change in london

If you are going directly North, I'd have thought the Thameslink route, with a change at St Pancras International was far better than the underground, especially for the leisure traveller away from the peaks.  Without much luggage I'd be tempted to walk to Euston as well...

Paul

 
Logged
plejaren
Full Member
***
Posts: 47


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: April 17, 2009, 18:36:37 »

true

but its a case of putting up with an extra 15 min on a tube from victoria, or an extra 45 on a painfully slow stopping everywhere fcc service
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: April 17, 2009, 18:51:48 »

Southern should switch to a fast Milton Keynes to Brighton service, instead of the slow Croydon - Milton service they have now.

To absorb any 3rd rail units, electrify: Uckfield - Lewes, Ore - Ashford, the West of England main line, Exeter to Barnstaple and Oakhampton, and the North Downs line.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10120


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: April 17, 2009, 19:31:05 »

To absorb any 3rd rail units, electrify: Uckfield - Lewes, Ore - Ashford, the West of England main line, Exeter to Barnstaple and Oakhampton, and the North Downs line.

I thought the only 3rd Rail electrification allowed now is for in-fill schemes, which rules out several of those above? If it didn't Basingstoke to Reading would be another good candidate.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: April 17, 2009, 20:03:17 »

Yes, but if the WOEML is to be electrified, it would be mad to use overhead cables, as there would be dual electrification from Woking to Waterloo! I, therefore, would count it as infill. This would make 3rd rail a better method for the Exmouth - Exeter - Barnstaple/Oakhampton line.

All the others are infill.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page