|
Btline
|
 |
« on: October 26, 2008, 19:15:01 » |
|
Assuming no subs, which Cotswold trains are HSTs▸ on Saturdays and Sundays?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
willc
|
|
« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2008, 00:04:38 » |
|
Easy, look at the timetable. As with all FGW▸ timetables, if it has a little H in a black blob at the top of the column above the train, it's booked for an HST▸ (though an Adelante could appear if the HST breaks).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #2 on: October 27, 2008, 14:49:44 » |
|
Ah, but the timetable puts H for both HSTs▸ and 180s!  I want to know where the HSTs are (i.e. avoid 180s). I know which trains are 180s during the week, but not at weekends. Does anyone know? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #3 on: October 27, 2008, 15:22:51 » |
|
Ah, but the timetable puts H for both HSTs▸ and 180s! I want to know where the HSTs are (i.e. avoid 180s). I know which trains are 180s during the week, but not at weekends. Does anyone know? It varies a little from week to week, but one of the morning services on a Saturday is usually a 180 - I think it's the 06:51 PAD» -GMV and return 09:55 GMV-PAD, and on a Sunday the 15:48 PAD- WOS» and return at 18:25 WOS-PAD are usually a 180 I think. There may be others. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/ |
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #4 on: October 27, 2008, 15:26:28 » |
|
Thanks, II.
If anyone knows of any other, please post. I want to avoid them, as they are more likely to be Thames Turboed!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
gwr2006
|
|
« Reply #5 on: October 27, 2008, 18:27:28 » |
|
The latest Saturday diagram I had for the 180's was a single unit (OC501) which worked
0851 Paddington to Great Malvern
1145 Great Malvern to Paddington
1551 Paddington to Great Malvern
1920 Great Malvern to Paddington
Obviously this may have changed due to fleet availability, and winter weekend engineering works are now beginning to start so this may also affect rolling stock.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #6 on: October 27, 2008, 18:51:43 » |
|
Thanks, GWR▸ . Any idea about Sunday?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
willc
|
|
« Reply #7 on: October 28, 2008, 00:06:44 » |
|
Got to say that apart from a dodgy period in September, with Turbos turning up on the 17.51 from London several times when HST▸ availability hit problems, that I haven't seen or heard of one appearing instead of an HST or an Adelante for many weeks now. Long may it continue.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #8 on: October 28, 2008, 17:17:27 » |
|
The 1606 Wor - Padd has not been Turboed for ages. It is diagramed a 180, but is "h" in the timetable!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
gwr2006
|
|
« Reply #9 on: October 28, 2008, 22:18:37 » |
|
The 1606 Wor - Padd has not been Turboed for ages. It is diagramed a 180, but is "h" in the timetable!
The 1606 (which is the 1519 from Hereford) was originally diagrammed to be an HST▸ and was operated by one at the start of the year. However, the very tight turnaround time at Hereford (just 19 minutes including the need to shunt via the sidings) meant it was notorious for running late towards Oxford and this then affected all the down peak trains on the single line. This train arrives in Oxford at 1735 so the 1731 Oxford-Worcester can depart. FGW▸ then managed to retain the 3 Adelantes and one was diagrammed to work this service as it can be turned around much quicker and ensure a right time departure. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
willc
|
|
« Reply #10 on: October 29, 2008, 00:20:33 » |
|
[It is diagramed a 180, but is "h" in the timetable!/quote]
Well, it is a high speed train, without the capitals. It accelerates better, if the rubber bands stay on, and can do 125mph between London and Didcot. And it's not got high-density seating! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #11 on: October 29, 2008, 11:47:06 » |
|
I'm also rather mystified by the avoidance of 180s. When they work, they are much more comfortable than an HST▸
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #12 on: October 29, 2008, 13:26:25 » |
|
More vibrations, and more likely to break down/ be Thames Turboed.
When are the 180s going? Is it December?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #13 on: October 29, 2008, 15:54:17 » |
|
When are the 180s going? Is it December?
Next JUNE is now being mentioned in certain circles! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/ |
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #14 on: October 29, 2008, 15:59:42 » |
|
Thames Turboed.
Thames Trains died many moons ago... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
