Train Graphic
Great Western Passengers' Forum Great Western Coffee Shop - [home] and [about]
Read about the forum [here]. Register and contribute [here] - it's free.
Random Image
Train Running @GWR Twitter Acronyms/Abbreviations Station Comparator Rail News GWR co. site Site Style 1 2 3 4 Chat on off
July 16, 2018, 01:41:46 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most liked recent subjects
[195] Always two sides to a story
[164] Has banksy been trespassing on railway property?
[109] Theale station during Kennet line outages
[43] Request stops - replacement of arms by buttons
[37] Stay at home Sunday
[32] The London Underground
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Greater Britain Rail News Round-Up (03/11/2008)  (Read 1326 times)
Lee
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6023

He who laughs last hasn't got all the facts.


View Profile
« on: November 03, 2008, 10:45:44 pm »

Andrew Adonis has announced the appointment of Millie Banerjee as Chair and Member of the British Transport Police Authority (link below.)
http://nds.coi.gov.uk/environment/fullDetail.asp?ReleaseID=382994&NewsAreaID=2&NavigatedFromDepartment=False

National Express East Coast have apologised after closing a ticket office at Waverley Station due to "staff shortages". The "tickets in advance" desk was closed around two hours earlier than normal last Saturday afternoon (link below.)
http://edinburghnews.scotsman.com/edinburgh/Rail-bosses-say-sorry-for.4651760.jp

Article about proposed cuts to the number of trains stopping at Kettering and Wellingborough (link below.)
http://www.northantset.co.uk/news/Trains-don39t-take-the-strain.4651041.jp

Californians are considering selling billions of dollars worth of bonds to start on an 800-mile system of bullet trains that could travel at 200 miles per hour, linking San Francisco and San Diego and the cities in between. In the Midwest, transportation officials are pushing a plan to connect cities in nine states in a hub-and-spoke system centered in Chicago (link below.)
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/11/03/america/03trains.php

Article on "Euro-commuting" between France and the UK (link below.)
http://www.shelteroffshore.com/index.php/living/more/euro-commuter-live-in-france-work-in-uk-10143/

The DfT has released its Stakeholder Briefing Document for the South Central Franchise (links below.)
http://www.rmtbristol.org.uk/2008/11/southern_stations_to_get_more.html#more

http://www.canber.co.uk/?q=node/48
Logged

Currently muddling along the Guingamp-Carhaix line
John R
TransWilts Member
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2008, 09:04:53 am »

An interesting comment on the CANBER site re the impact of reducing stops at places such as Winchelsea. Whilst this has indeed reduced passenger numbers from around 7,700 a year to a fifth of that, 7,700 translates to 24 entries and exits per day, ie 12 return passenger journeys.

So, playing devils advocate, I can see why it was felt the benefits of speeding up the Ashford - Brighton service by cutting out intermediate stops was preferable to retaining 3 very lightly used calls. 
Logged
Lee
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6023

He who laughs last hasn't got all the facts.


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2008, 09:40:26 am »

An interesting comment on the CANBER site re the impact of reducing stops at places such as Winchelsea. Whilst this has indeed reduced passenger numbers from around 7,700 a year to a fifth of that, 7,700 translates to 24 entries and exits per day, ie 12 return passenger journeys.

So, playing devils advocate, I can see why it was felt the benefits of speeding up the Ashford - Brighton service by cutting out intermediate stops was preferable to retaining 3 very lightly used calls. 

Balanced against that (and bearing in mind that John is playing devils advocate) :

- It wasnt a case of speeding up a Ashford-Brighton service that already existed, more one of replacing a stopping Ashford-Hastings service with a faster Ashford-Brighton service. Such a philosophy was a feature of the Beeching era, and although others take a different view, I worry that this jeopardises the future of the smaller stations affected.

- Local campaigners recognise the point made by John, and are asking that some, not all, trains should stop at these stations, more or less alternatively and at reasonable bihourly times. This would be similar to say, Appleford and Culham or certain stations east of Guildford on the North Downs Line.

- When the DfT say "The withdrawal of the intermediate stops of Winchelsea, Doleham and Three Oaks has generated considerable local opposition", they aint kidding. I rather suspect that any extra stops would be better used than previous passenger figures would suggest.

- There are now three trains a day in each direction calling at these stations, but these generally run at inconvenient times early in the morning or late at night. This is yet another example of services being reduced to parliamentary levels, and CANBER felt it was right to oppose that.

The main point I was trying to put across when writing that article was that I feel that the DfT are shirking the issue by not being prepared to specify extra stops off their own back. Instead, bidders for the franchise will be invited to form their own views on the stopping patterns for these trains compared with the value of reduced journey times.

Being commercial organisations, they will probably reach the same conclusion that John did, allowing the DfT to tell the locals "not our fault, blame them."
Logged

Currently muddling along the Guingamp-Carhaix line
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants