Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 17:15 27 Apr 2024
- Boy finds rare Lego toy on beach after two-year search
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

No 'On This Day' events reported for 27th Apr

Train RunningCancelled
15:09 Gloucester to Weymouth
18:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
20:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
Additional 20:57 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
21:01 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
21:28 Westbury to Salisbury
Short Run
27/04/24 15:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
16:02 Westbury to Gloucester
16:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
17:43 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
18:10 Gloucester to Westbury
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
18:28 Exmouth to Paignton
19:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
19:13 Salisbury to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:22 Paignton to Exmouth
22:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:30 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
17:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 27, 2024, 17:26:19 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[91] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[47] access for all at Devon stations report
[30] Who we are - the people behind firstgreatwestern.info
[11] Bonaparte's at Bristol Temple Meads
[2] Lack of rolling stock due to attacks on shipping in the Red Se...
[1] Cornish delays
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 68
  Print  
Author Topic: FGW 1st Class - ongoing discussion of the benefits and their apparent reduction  (Read 393880 times)
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 9842



View Profile
« Reply #105 on: October 13, 2013, 15:19:05 »

Well it was said to me and three others on board a train....
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6299


View Profile
« Reply #106 on: October 13, 2013, 16:16:24 »

Are there any sets with three first class coaches? So let see me if I've got this right. Sets with micro buffet that have two FC(resolve) carriages will lose half a coach. Sets with a full buffet/kitchen will be turned around with First class's seats replaced with standard seats leaving two full First class carriages?
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12365


View Profile Email
« Reply #107 on: October 13, 2013, 16:40:07 »

Oh. Sorry. For three, read two plus half in buffet. One full coaxh declassified reduces them all to 1.5 coaches in 1st
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17895


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #108 on: October 13, 2013, 16:41:21 »

Thanks for clarifying that, ChrisB.
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #109 on: October 13, 2013, 16:43:27 »

Being slightly pedantic, only 1.35, as there are only 17 seats next to the buffet.

Wonder which will be the quiet carriage going forward? From experience the "third of a coach" can be very noisy being next to the buffet, so hopefully not that one.
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6299


View Profile
« Reply #110 on: October 13, 2013, 16:56:58 »

Being slightly pedantic, only 1.35, as there are only 17 seats next to the buffet.

Wonder which will be the quiet carriage going forward? From experience the "third of a coach" can be very noisy being next to the buffet, so hopefully not that one.
Not pedantic at all John as we are talking about even less seats in First on sets that are the original restaurant/buffet cars when HSTs (High Speed Train) first started service. I don't think there are many sets which were half the carriage buffet and half standard seats in service which were then converted by Intercity into First class to give extra capacity in First! How times have changed. I assume these were pulled when micro buffets were installed in Standard leaving only the full kitchen/ buffets in service to provide Pullman and Travelling Chef services when required.

You are right when you say that is not a quiet place to sit when the buffet is open. They could put a door there but I doubt that will happen.

On East Coast HSTs that is the 'quiet coach' which is crazy as you have the crew working in that area who provide the First class complimentary service.
Logged
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #111 on: October 13, 2013, 17:23:28 »

FGW (First Great Western) HSTs (High Speed Train) are not particularly over-endowed with first class seats compared with equivalent services of some other main line operators, such as Virgin West Coast - I would guess on the lower density sets there would be at least 3 times the number of standard seats compared with first, and somewhat more on the higher. The filling up of the standard class progressively seems to have overwhelmed the stop gap measures already taken not that long ago though.

However, I guess a problem would only really arise if the first class becomes a regular standing area for people on full or season tickets, although the people who still expect the sole use of a four-seat table will be disappointed much sooner.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12365


View Profile Email
« Reply #112 on: October 13, 2013, 18:39:24 »

If Milton Keynes was treated the same way as FGW (First Great Western) has to treat Reading, I strongly suspect Virgin would be doing the same!
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #113 on: October 13, 2013, 18:41:30 »

However, I guess a problem would only really arise if the first class becomes a regular standing area for people on full or season tickets, although the people who still expect the sole use of a four-seat table will be disappointed much sooner.
I've been having a quick check each day this week on the 1630 Paddington to Taunton on departure from Swindon. It's been roughly 50% full (to my surprise I'll admit - thought it would be less). Now on the full buffet sets, seats are being reduced from 113 to 65, ie a 43% reduction. If it were 50% full beforehand then it will be 87% full after the change. I'm guessing as well that this service will have more in 1st east of Swindon than west, so that would indicate that it'll be pretty close to full at some part of the journey.

Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18924



View Profile
« Reply #114 on: October 13, 2013, 21:05:47 »

Being slightly pedantic, only 1.35, as there are only 17 seats next to the buffet.

And being further pedantic, some buffet coaches have 24 seats. Easy to spot the difference from the outside - 17 seaters have three large windows, 24 seaters have four.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #115 on: October 13, 2013, 21:11:31 »

Ah, never noticed that (though I usually head for the quiet coach). What's the reason? Is it the buffets that were acquired from another TOC (Train Operating Company) some years ago are slightly different (was it MML» (Midland Main Line. - about) as was?)

Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6299


View Profile
« Reply #116 on: October 14, 2013, 06:05:45 »

Ah, never noticed that (though I usually head for the quiet coach). What's the reason? Is it the buffets that were acquired from another TOC (Train Operating Company) some years ago are slightly different (was it MML» (Midland Main Line. - about) as was?)
As built by BR (British Rail(ways)). Some buffets had a larger kitchen and less seating (First class) to act as a Restaurant (3 windows). Other buffets had a much smaller kitchen area and Standard seating (4 windows) Intercity converted these 4 window buffets to First class in the early 90s. Do any of these 4 window buffets still operate on the Western region or were these all converted into Standard coaches by FGW (First Great Western)?

More information can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Rail_Mark_3#Original_formation
Logged
BBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 634


View Profile
« Reply #117 on: October 14, 2013, 10:14:06 »

As built by BR (British Rail(ways)). Some buffets had a larger kitchen and less seating (First class) to act as a Restaurant (3 windows). Other buffets had a much smaller kitchen area and Standard seating (4 windows) Intercity converted these 4 window buffets to First class in the early 90s. Do any of these 4 window buffets still operate on the Western region or were these all converted into Standard coaches by FGW (First Great Western)?

A little Googling took me to this photo page: http://shed83a.smugmug.com/CoachingStock/Mk3-HST/Mk3-TRB-402xx

Down the bottom are recent photos of FGW TRBs 40900-40904 which each have 4 windows and appear to have been originally TRSBs - were these the conversions from the early 90s? But it looks like they might have been later purchases?
« Last Edit: October 14, 2013, 10:22:18 by BBM » Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #118 on: October 14, 2013, 13:13:44 »

Just to confuse things, some TFBs (Trailer First Buffet (Mark 3 coach type)) were converted to TRFBs (Trailer Restaurant First Buffet (Mark 3 coach type)) to include a larger kitchen. (from 4 windows to 3 windows). These can be seen by one of the large windows simply being painted over as oppose to bodywork.
Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #119 on: October 14, 2013, 14:27:13 »

There will only be an extra STD coach where there are 3 1st class coaches now - the sets with only 2 1st Class coaches will have half a coach declassified to STD. So there'll be a minimum of 1.5 1st class coaches - and those with a full buffet will have two.
So, will micro-buffet sets be:
43 - TGS - TS - TS - TS - TS - TSMB - TC(resolve) - TF - 43? Or will the micro-buffet become a composite coach?

And will the other sets have standard class in the buffet car (like IC225s) and be formed as:
43 - TGS - TS - TS - TS - TS - TSB - TF - TF - 43?

Personally I think having first class seats in the buffet car, but with the buffet end coupled to standard class, is a good idea. I also think 3 full coaches of first class is too much, it should be 2.5 or 1.5 (with the other half of the .5 being the kitchen/buffet). So the IC225s should be formed like the GW (Great Western) IC125s currently are (ie. 2x FO, 1x FirstClassBuffet, 6xTSO) and IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) trains should be formed DTS - 5x TSO (The Stationary Office (now OPSI)) - FirstClassBuffet - FO - DTF (or 6x TSO at the cost of the FO) rather than the current plans to have 5-car sets and have the only kitchen/buffet on the entire set tucked away in the first class driving vehicle.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 68
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page