Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:35 27 Apr 2024
- Boy finds rare Lego toy on beach after two-year search
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

No 'On This Day' events reported for 27th Apr

Train RunningCancelled
17:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
20:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
Additional 20:57 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
21:01 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
21:28 Westbury to Salisbury
Short Run
17:43 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
18:10 Gloucester to Westbury
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
19:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
19:13 Salisbury to Worcester Shrub Hill
22:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
17:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 27, 2024, 18:40:23 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[91] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[47] access for all at Devon stations report
[30] Who we are - the people behind firstgreatwestern.info
[11] Bonaparte's at Bristol Temple Meads
[2] Lack of rolling stock due to attacks on shipping in the Red Se...
[1] Cornish delays
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 25 26 [27] 28 29 ... 68
  Print  
Author Topic: FGW 1st Class - ongoing discussion of the benefits and their apparent reduction  (Read 393894 times)
Southern Stag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 984


View Profile
« Reply #390 on: April 19, 2014, 17:22:13 »

I was comparing returns as they're generally much better value, sorry I didn't make that clear.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #391 on: April 19, 2014, 20:35:58 »

Coz the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) told them to?

There may be a pattern developing.  The new Greater Anglia direct award franchise also includes reduction of first class provision, in their case by replacement of the first class in 7 catering vehicles with standard.  The press release says something about 24 FC(resolve) taken out, 44 Standard in.

It may be that what they do on the ECML (East Coast Main Line) now is no guide to the future...

Paul
Logged
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 973


View Profile
« Reply #392 on: April 19, 2014, 21:33:47 »

All this is though is a short term fix, the government needs to start looking at long term capacity needs.  It's all well and good converting First Class to Standard but realistically how long is that going to provide a solution, 5 maybe even 10 years and we will be back to square one given the growth in rail travel.
You can't keep putting fares up to deter people from travelling by rail. 
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #393 on: April 19, 2014, 22:13:55 »

All this is though is a short term fix, the government needs to start looking at long term capacity needs.  It's all well and good converting First Class to Standard but realistically how long is that going to provide a solution, 5 maybe even 10 years and we will be back to square one given the growth in rail travel.
You can't keep putting fares up to deter people from travelling by rail. 

With electrification, cross rail and IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.)'s won't we have extra capacity by then?
Logged
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 973


View Profile
« Reply #394 on: April 19, 2014, 22:44:41 »

All this is though is a short term fix, the government needs to start looking at long term capacity needs.  It's all well and good converting First Class to Standard but realistically how long is that going to provide a solution, 5 maybe even 10 years and we will be back to square one given the growth in rail travel.
You can't keep putting fares up to deter people from travelling by rail. 

With electrification, cross rail and IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.)'s won't we have extra capacity by then?

Yes, they'll be additional capacity, especially if the signalling system is upgraded to ERTMS (European Rail Traffic Management System.) but I'm not personally convinced the IEP's will provided the massive increase in capacity everyone is expecting.  It won't guarantee everyone travelling via Paddington in the peak a seat.  Once all the work is completed I don't think it'll provide enough of an increase in capacity past the next 10 years and when the trains return to being overcrowded what is the next solution?  There doesn't seem to be any long term plan, there is no room for growth past what the IEP will offer.

Undoubtably though, users of the CrossRail services will see the biggest increase in capacity.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #395 on: April 20, 2014, 00:04:45 »

Exactly, it's like the  "widening on the cheap" on the m42/m25 motorways (converting hard shoulders into peak extra lanes)

It's just so desperate politicians can get a photo shoot in a hard hat and say "look I'm doing something"... before going home and filling in their expenses.

This ludicrous policy will decimate the income brought in by wealthy business travellers and drive people onto the roads and onto planes.

Sorry if you think that's an exaggeration and that I'm being a "fairy", but I think it will happen.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #396 on: April 20, 2014, 08:05:44 »

Exactly, it's like the  "widening on the cheap" on the m42/m25 motorways (converting hard shoulders into peak extra lanes)

It's just so desperate politicians can get a photo shoot in a hard hat and say "look I'm doing something"... before going home and filling in their expenses.

This ludicrous policy will decimate the income brought in by wealthy business travellers and drive people onto the roads and onto planes.

Alternatively it is an honest attempt to do something to address the capacity issues in advance of the IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project.) becoming available.  This government is not normally accused of discrimination against the wealthy.
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #397 on: April 20, 2014, 09:20:37 »

Exactly, it's like the  "widening on the cheap" on the m42/m25 motorways (converting hard shoulders into peak extra lanes)


I think the peak hours only system has been proved to work well. Unfortunately it wasn't cheap enough for the government so the latest versions have done away with the hard shoulder completely, and are, in the eyes of many people including the motoring organisations, likely to be proved to be very dangerous.

It's one thing breaking down on a very congested slow running motorway with lower speed limits in place and another doing so when the motorway is free flowing and the national speed limit in force.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7800



View Profile
« Reply #398 on: April 20, 2014, 09:39:55 »

Exactly, it's like the  "widening on the cheap" on the m42/m25 motorways (converting hard shoulders into peak extra lanes)

It's just so desperate politicians can get a photo shoot in a hard hat and say "look I'm doing something"... before going home and filling in their expenses.

This ludicrous policy will decimate the income brought in by wealthy business travellers and drive people onto the roads and onto planes.

Alternatively it is an honest attempt to do something to address the capacity issues in advance of the IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project.) becoming available.  This government is not normally accused of discrimination against the wealthy.

It may be an honest attempt, it may just be window dressing, either way its a pretty feeble & unimaginative effort to address an issue which has been ongoing & getting worse for many years.
Logged
Network SouthEast
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 492



View Profile
« Reply #399 on: April 20, 2014, 10:30:21 »

Forgive me if this has been posted previously,  but at 27 pages long....

Anyway, there's been a staff briefing about the new 1st class config on HSTs (High Speed Train). Here's the gist:

Electric door on the composite 1st/std coach separating the two classes. It will be push button operated rather than pressure pad on the floor.

New, more comfortable, head rests with some kind of movable side rest. Mention of a similar arrangement to that of headrests on Beoing aircraft.

Privacy screens between the backs of groups of seats.

Logged
Network SouthEast
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 492



View Profile
« Reply #400 on: April 20, 2014, 10:35:39 »

By the way, of course we won't have enough capacity in 10/20/50/100 years if passenger figures keep growing. That's a fact of life. But how can you plan for 50 years time? Look at how the railway and country has changed since the 1955 modernisation plan! Back then Britain was a very different place to now in terms of industry, people in work, finances etc...

I think the Network Rail RUSs (Route Utilisation Strategy) take the right approach to long term planning.  For example they talk about schemes that aren't viable now or even in 10 years for the GWML (Great Western Main Line), but which might be viable if things carry on the way they are by 2020.
Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #401 on: April 20, 2014, 10:38:21 »

All this is though is a short term fix, the government needs to start looking at long term capacity needs.  It's all well and good converting First Class to Standard but realistically how long is that going to provide a solution, 5 maybe even 10 years and we will be back to square one given the growth in rail travel.
You can't keep putting fares up to deter people from travelling by rail. 

With electrification, cross rail and IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.)'s won't we have extra capacity by then?
With IEP, yes extra capacity on the electric routes (2+8 IC125 to 9-car new trains), but some diesel routes will see SHORTER trains with LESS capacity (2+8 IC125 to 5-car new trains). Yes, the 5-cars will sometimes run in pairs to give 10-cars (with the same capacity as the 9-car 'electric' units, due to having two kitchens (for 1st class passengers only, judging by the current draft layouts) and four cabs), but as far as I can tell they haven't ordered nearly enough 5-cars to have many 10-car formations.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #402 on: April 20, 2014, 10:53:14 »


New, more comfortable, head rests with some kind of movable side rest. Mention of a similar arrangement to that of headrests on Beoing aircraft.
How about some flat beds?  Grin
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12365


View Profile Email
« Reply #403 on: April 20, 2014, 12:23:54 »

Electric door on the composite 1st/std coach separating the two classes. It will be push button operated rather than pressure pad on the floor.

Oooh, I hope this is a sliding door & not an swing/hinged door then - the Crossrail trains have a hinged door separating the vestibule & 1st class seats that swings into the 1st accommodation & will hinder those sat in seats the other side....
Logged
Network SouthEast
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 492



View Profile
« Reply #404 on: April 21, 2014, 22:03:48 »


Oooh, I hope this is a sliding door & not an swing/hinged door then - the Crossrail trains have a hinged door separating the vestibule & 1st class seats that swings into the 1st accommodation & will hinder those sat in seats the other side....
They'll be sliding doors.

By the way, I think you're referring to the Thameslink trains internal layout, not Crossrail.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 25 26 [27] 28 29 ... 68
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page