Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:15 27 Apr 2024
- Boy finds rare Lego toy on beach after two-year search
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

No 'On This Day' events reported for 27th Apr

Train RunningCancelled
15:09 Gloucester to Weymouth
17:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
20:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
Additional 20:57 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
21:01 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
21:28 Westbury to Salisbury
Short Run
17:43 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
18:10 Gloucester to Westbury
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
19:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
19:13 Salisbury to Worcester Shrub Hill
22:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
17:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 27, 2024, 18:19:10 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[91] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[47] access for all at Devon stations report
[30] Who we are - the people behind firstgreatwestern.info
[11] Bonaparte's at Bristol Temple Meads
[2] Lack of rolling stock due to attacks on shipping in the Red Se...
[1] Cornish delays
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 29 30 [31] 32 33 ... 68
  Print  
Author Topic: FGW 1st Class - ongoing discussion of the benefits and their apparent reduction  (Read 393891 times)
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10120


View Profile
« Reply #450 on: May 22, 2014, 13:51:51 »

Funny that II, I make most of my journeys on the 180s these days and I have only ever seen a trolley being removed from the train after arrival at Oxford from Paddington, I have never seen a trolley west of Oxford (even when there is room to wheel it down the train).

That's surprising.  Most of the 180s down to Worcester and Great Malvern have a trolley service throughout (and have had pretty much since their re-introduction), and though sometimes there is a change of staff/trolley at Oxford, it's more often a case of the existing trolley being topped up with stock at Oxford.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
charles_uk
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 714

thewalkingpage
View Profile
« Reply #451 on: May 22, 2014, 16:19:58 »

Funny that II, I make most of my journeys on the 180s these days and I have only ever seen a trolley being removed from the train after arrival at Oxford from Paddington, I have never seen a trolley west of Oxford (even when there is room to wheel it down the train).

That's surprising.  Most of the 180s down to Worcester and Great Malvern have a trolley service throughout (and have had pretty much since their re-introduction), and though sometimes there is a change of staff/trolley at Oxford, it's more often a case of the existing trolley being topped up with stock at Oxford.

Until this week, the trolley was always removed from the 1552 PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains):WOS» (Worcester Shrub Hill - next trains) at Oxford (and often the ramp wasn't ready which didn't help with the numbers waiting to get on). This week the trolley has remained on - albeit stationary in 1st class - and, instead, there has simply been what looks like additional water put on board at Oxford.
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #452 on: May 24, 2014, 22:15:12 »

Think it's the right place.

ian Walmsley has an interesting article in june's Modern railways comparing the First Class offerings of various TOCs (Train Operating Company). Makes an interesting comaprison with a Cunard Cruise at ^3.47 per hour and Virgin from Manchester London at ^191.93 per hour 

Now for my query is Pendelino First worth an Extra ^29.50 over Standard for Stockport via London to Taplow. (^46 - 16.50)

Vigin via Reading give a ridiculous fare of ^204 for First on a Vomiter ^26 standard. I'm not sure i even want to do Stockport to Reading in Standard on a Vomiter!

Hoping to go To Huddersfield via GC» (Great Central Railway - link to heritage line) to Halifax (OK some track bashing but an advance from KX is only ^14.XX) Is it worth  looking at 180 first as standard is not bad apart from underfloor engine.

Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18924



View Profile
« Reply #453 on: May 24, 2014, 22:45:17 »

It won't be Virgin to Reading from Stockport. That's Arriva CrossCountry.

I'd suggest any further queries regarding fares and routes you'd like to take should be made in a new topic on the Fare's Fair board. Don't forget date, time, number travelling and whether any Railcards are held.  Smiley
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
NickB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 712


View Profile
« Reply #454 on: May 28, 2014, 08:17:57 »

And the quiet carriage stickers have been removed as well.

Not across the board so far, there's still plenty floating around this morning with quiet carriage stickers...

Also a coach M on those sets that have a full size buffet - with the old coach F being the new K. I expect M is temporary and will be removed as the conversions are completed


I can happily report that Coach L on the 7.08 Maidenhead-->Padd (5am ish from Worcester) was defined as a Quiet Carriage.  After two weeks of 'noisy' Coach L this was nice.
Logged
chrisr_75
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1019


View Profile
« Reply #455 on: May 28, 2014, 08:34:01 »

And the quiet carriage stickers have been removed as well.

Not across the board so far, there's still plenty floating around this morning with quiet carriage stickers...

Also a coach M on those sets that have a full size buffet - with the old coach F being the new K. I expect M is temporary and will be removed as the conversions are completed


I can happily report that Coach L on the 7.08 Maidenhead-->Padd (5am ish from Worcester) was defined as a Quiet Carriage.  After two weeks of 'noisy' Coach L this was nice.


Don't get too used to it! Travelling yesterday morning, the only quiet carriage announcement was made for coach A in standard. The quiet coach stickers seem to now be disappearing rapidly from first class.
Logged
NickB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 712


View Profile
« Reply #456 on: May 28, 2014, 09:05:32 »

But why on earth would they do this?!?!   It is just stupid.
Logged
chrisr_75
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1019


View Profile
« Reply #457 on: May 28, 2014, 09:28:49 »

But why on earth would they do this?!?!   It is just stupid.

Indeed it is! I have abandoned first class for the time being, yesterday morning the standard class quiet carriage was actually rather more peaceful than it's former first class counterpart. They seem intent on driving as many people out of first as possible...
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5410



View Profile
« Reply #458 on: May 28, 2014, 10:22:50 »

I suspect that now MPs (Member of Parliament) can not use first at the public expense, that pressure to remove it entirely will grow.
Wont happen overnight of course of course, but a little at a time.
The next logical step on HSTs (High Speed Train) will be to reduce first class from a one and a half coaches to just one.
"people find it confusing to have first and standard in the same coach"
"first complain that the half coach was regularly invaded by standard"

Followed by the abolition of any catering beyond a trolley.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7800



View Profile
« Reply #459 on: May 28, 2014, 10:49:31 »

........looks to me like the law of unintended consequences is having a major effect on what was on the face of it an honest attempt to improve capacity - 1st class customers across the piece are going to suffer and the "premium" service being paid for is being degraded in a number of ways.....perhaps a consequence of taking the easy option?
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10120


View Profile
« Reply #460 on: May 28, 2014, 11:54:10 »

Possibly worth waiting until the conversion work is complete, before you all decide it was a terrible mistake.  In the meantime, there's bound to be a little disruption to the provision of first class whilst vehicles go in for refurbishment, as there was when the original refresh took place towards the end of the last decade.  As for taking the 'easy option', surely that would have been to do nothing and watch standard class crowding get worse and worse (with half empty first class carriages on the vast majority of trains) until the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.)'s arrive?

Personally, I look forward to seeing the new First Class layout (and will comment good or bad then, not now) hoping it to be an improvement on the current service with free wi-fi long overdue!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5410



View Profile
« Reply #461 on: May 28, 2014, 12:59:15 »

IMO (in my opinion), the reduction in first class IS a mistake, and I DO feel able to judge this without waiting for the work to be complete.
No matter how wonderfull the conversion work may be, it is still a substantial reduction in first class capacity which is often well filled on rush hour services.

It seems to me that the Reading commuters are the main problem, with many choosing to stand on an HST (High Speed Train) rather than sit on a slower service, and then complaining about "having to stand"
It would appear that the answer is to provide a couple of special services that serve ONLY Reading, and to stop fewer long distance trains at Reading. Platform capacity at Reading should not be a problem with the recent improvements.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12365


View Profile Email
« Reply #462 on: May 28, 2014, 13:21:31 »

I don't think I've *ever* seen *every* seat filled in 1st class, sorry....
Logged
chrisr_75
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1019


View Profile
« Reply #463 on: May 28, 2014, 13:21:55 »

IMO (in my opinion), the reduction in first class IS a mistake, and I DO feel able to judge this without waiting for the work to be complete.
No matter how wonderfull the conversion work may be, it is still a substantial reduction in first class capacity which is often well filled on rush hour services.

It seems to me that the Reading commuters are the main problem, with many choosing to stand on an HST (High Speed Train) rather than sit on a slower service, and then complaining about "having to stand"
It would appear that the answer is to provide a couple of special services that serve ONLY Reading, and to stop fewer long distance trains at Reading. Platform capacity at Reading should not be a problem with the recent improvements.

I would fully agree that Reading is a major problem for long distance services. During the improvement works at Reading the 19.15 (iirc) to Swansea was non-stopping Reading, first stop Swindon. Whilst still busy, it was acceptably so and not the usual crush loading found at that time of day. Incidentally FGW (First Great Western) were planning a 19.12 departure for Swansea, first stop BPW» (Bristol Parkway - next trains), had trains, staff, paths etc available but DfT» (Department for Transport - about) vetoed it according to a FGW train manager I spoke to.

The reduction in first capacity in my humble opinion will not really address any capacity issues. Notably this change appears to have been imposed having had no consultation with paying customers or the taxpayer who has largely funded the forthcoming conversion.
Logged
chrisr_75
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1019


View Profile
« Reply #464 on: May 28, 2014, 13:30:14 »

I don't think I've *ever* seen *every* seat filled in 1st class, sorry....

I have a few times, especially at weekends, but isn't that the whole point? Pay more = get more space?! They would've done better making more cheap advance fares available and promoting them properly - the only cost involved then would be a small change to the booking systems and a bit of targeted marketing rather than spending millions polishing 40 year old tu...er, trains only for them to be scrapped as IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) comes along in a few years.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 29 30 [31] 32 33 ... 68
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page