Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:15 01 May 2024
- 'Filming them filming us' - BBC on ship chased by Chinese in South China Sea
- Ex-Camelot boss named as new Post Office chairman
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
1st May (1928)
Inauguaral non stop "Flying Scotsman" London to Edinburgh

Train RunningCancelled
20:16 Frome to Westbury
21:02 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
Delayed
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:18 Carmarthen to London Paddington
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
23:22 Gatwick Airport to Reading
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 01, 2024, 20:31:06 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[96] Train drivers "overwhelmingly white middle aged men"
[69] Visiting the pub on the way home.
[56] Vintage film - how valid are these issues today?
[54] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] [otd] 20.10.1979 - First meeting, Guild of Railway Artists
[44] Where was I today, 29.04.24?
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 141 142 [143] 144 145 ... 176
  Print  
Author Topic: Great Western Main Line electrification - ongoing discussion  (Read 1056796 times)
simonw
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 591


View Profile Email
« Reply #2130 on: November 08, 2016, 20:01:03 »

What impact will this decision have on transfer of stock to local and regional services in the Bristol area?
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #2131 on: November 08, 2016, 20:08:10 »

I wonder if GWR (Great Western Railway) has thought about this?
I am sure this has been very much at the top of their agenda for some time now. It would be remarkable if it is not, given how critical this cascade is to the continued running let alone expansion of the regional services.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10122


View Profile
« Reply #2132 on: November 08, 2016, 20:14:00 »

What impact will this decision have on transfer of stock to local and regional services in the Bristol area?

Probably not a particularly huge one.  Oxford to Didcot local shuttles could run at their present 30-minute frequency using three units - in fact you could probably get away with two.  Add in one for the Windsor and one for the Henley branches and you might be looking at four or five more units staying that had been envisaged.  Of course, things like the Vivarail D-Train could conceivably be used on both branches to reduce that number even less.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40849



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2133 on: November 08, 2016, 20:15:46 »

I wonder if GWR (Great Western Railway) has thought about this?
I am sure this has been very much at the top of their agenda for some time now. It would be remarkable if it is not, given how critical this cascade is to the continued running let alone expansion of the regional services.

The issue has, I believe, been very much on their radar.  Being on the radar is different to being able to wave a magic wand ...

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40849



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2134 on: November 08, 2016, 20:23:11 »

What impact will this decision have on transfer of stock to local and regional services in the Bristol area?

Probably not a particularly huge one.  Oxford to Didcot local shuttles could run at their present 30-minute frequency using three units - in fact you could probably get away with two.  Add in one for the Windsor and one for the Henley branches and you might be looking at four or five more units staying that had been envisaged.  Of course, things like the Vivarail D-Train could conceivably be used on both branches to reduce that number even less.

Relieved to read that ... agrees with my guess in an email to someone.

So what would happen to the four or five class 387s that will no longer be able to take those services over?

D Trains to Windsor would be sort of poetic justice:

http://www.thamesweb.co.uk/windsor/windsorhistory/underground.html

Quote
The District line in London started operation on 24th December 1868 running from South Kensington to Westminster. The line was progressively extended from Westminster eastwards towards the City of London and westwards, reaching Hammersmith by 1874, Richmond in 1877 and Ealing Broadway in 1879.
  In 1883 a service was introduced to Windsor from Ealing Broadway using the tracks of the Great Western Railway, but this was withdrawn in 1885.
  So Windsor was once an 'underground' station!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10122


View Profile
« Reply #2135 on: November 08, 2016, 21:00:19 »

So what would happen to the four or five class 387s that will no longer be able to take those services over?

Hopefully they'll be used to provide lots of 12-car Swindon to Paddington peak hour services... Wink
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6299


View Profile
« Reply #2136 on: November 08, 2016, 22:10:45 »

I think the main line can cope with (hopefully temporary) pausing of electrification, Thingley-Bristol-Parkway is not a 125mph stretch of line. The real problem as I see it is by deferring the Oxford electrification the transfer of all those nice 166 Turbos to Bristol for strengthening will be much delayed. This must mean Cardiff-Portsmouth soldiers on for years to come with inadequate 3 car 158s, which might be ok in the middle of the day but not in the crowded peaks. Then of course there is the knock on effect further west with no 158s going to the Barstaple line and presumably no 150s for Devon & Cornwall. I wonder if GWR (Great Western Railway) has thought about this?
4/5 coach short formed HSTs (High Speed Train) is what we'll see. Has been mentioned earlier this year though not yet officially announced, just talk in the rail related press. I suspect GWR have known for sometime Network Rail were struggling with this project more so than what we already knew with deadlines slipping backwards.
Logged
Thatcham Crossing
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 793


View Profile
« Reply #2137 on: November 08, 2016, 22:23:43 »

Quote
nothing over 100 between Reading and Newbury

I believe there is a 110 section between just east of Newbury Racecourse and Kintbury, although this is of no use to electric trains that can only run to Newbury.
Logged
onthecushions
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 977


View Profile
« Reply #2138 on: November 08, 2016, 23:13:45 »


There does seem to be some logic in these delays in that electric traction will be available for the high speed part of the Bristol route although it may be entertaining to see how the diesels cope with the Eastward climb through Box tunnel (1/100). Perhaps the wires should stretch the extra 11 miles beyond Thingley to Bath.
The rest of the line from Bath Westwards is either level or at 1/1320, so should be easy work for a diesel.

Doubtless there is every reason to keep diesels out of the similarly graded Seven tunnel and also the politics of serving the Welsh capital will have a bearing.

The Didcot to Oxford delay seems a pity at first, until one sees the thin entries and exits for Appleford, Culham and Radley but the change needed for those bound for Oxford from Thames valley local stations will be grim, as will be the effects of the smaller "cascade" of Turbos further West.

GWR (Great Western Railway) will no doubt feel that their bi-modes will fend off Chiltern's competition.

OTC
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7173


View Profile
« Reply #2139 on: November 08, 2016, 23:50:40 »

I don't think the flat-out speed of an 800 matters much in itself, so much as the lousy acceleration up to (say) 160 km/hr. The acceleration at low speeds is limited by adhesion (and sometimes by the drive as well), up to a threshold above which it is power-limited. That threshold is lower when less power is available.

Peering at the back of my (Microsoft-supplied) envelope, it looks roughly like this:                 

Threshold, km/hr    seconds to 160 km/hr
800, electric   61113
802, diesel29226
800, diesel37312
HST (High Speed Train)60262

Some of the parameters that were used in that are only estimatesguesses, bit the general trend should be right. And that says ... worse than an HST. And that down-rating really hurts.

Gradients make less difference than you'd expect, at least on this flat track. Once up to speed at below 180km/hr, there is enough power in hand for 1 in 100. (Re)accelerating up any gradient will always be slower, though.

Heating/cooling load also matters, and could be a bigger issue. I don't know how that's done on 80xs, but as Hitachi make HVAC units for trains you'd expect to see that fitted. I don't think they do CO2 and air-cycle ones, which (as I understand it) are more easily reversed for efficient heating.
Logged
ray951
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 462


View Profile
« Reply #2140 on: November 09, 2016, 09:26:06 »

This is the National Audit Office (NAO) view on the impact of the electrification delays on the rolling stock cascade:


Does ordering extra AT300's for the Oxford route suggest that the electrification is not just delayed but effectively cancelled?
« Last Edit: November 09, 2016, 09:31:09 by ray951 » Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18924



View Profile
« Reply #2141 on: November 09, 2016, 09:38:41 »

I bet FirstGroup are beginning to regret riding on the coat tails of Network Rail with their advertising that promised various improvements by certain dates. Some of those promises may never now be kept and others won't happen for another 2 or more years.

Serves them right for running such a disingenuous ad campaign.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #2142 on: November 09, 2016, 09:46:04 »

This is the National Audit Office (NAO) view on the impact of the electrification delays on the rolling stock cascade:


Does ordering extra AT300's for the Oxford route suggest that the electrification is not just delayed but effectively cancelled?

Interesting the statement about the retention of 11 HST (High Speed Train)'s.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12367


View Profile Email
« Reply #2143 on: November 09, 2016, 11:27:52 »

From yesterday's Oxford Area newsletter from NR» (Network Rail - home page) -

Quote
Work continues at Oxford Station to construct new platforms and accommodation building at Oxford Station.  We have  written to our neighbours around  the station to let them know that we will be working 24/7 from Wednesday 9 November to Sunday 11 December.  This work is necessary to allow us to open the new platforms on time on 12 December. We apologise for any inconvenience caused by this work, but can assure our neighbours that we will do everything possible to minimise disruption during this time.

.....
Work on the Down Sidings north of the station


We are currently upgrading and remodeling the ‘Down Sidings’ directly opposite the Oxford University accommodation.
 
 Monday 7th - Friday 11th November
 07:00 to 15:00
 Removal of existing siding 1 and 160 meter renewal of ballast which will include the use of diggers and on track machines.
 
 Saturday 12 November - Monday 14 November
 23:00 – 04:45
 Loading of waste material from siding 1 onto an engineering train for removal from site. Reballast and install sleepers and ballast for new siding 1.
 
 Monday to Friday 14th - 18th November
 07:00 - 15:00
 Excavate 150 meters of spoil for new siding and remove by train, install 150 meters of bottom ballast and reinstate existing sleepers and install new rails.
 
 Monday 21 November - Friday 25 November
 07:00 - 15:00
 Remove 40 meters of spoil and transfer to the yard, install 40 meters of bottom ballast and connect new siding to existing siding. Delivery and installation of new top ballast by engineering train.
 
 Saturday 26th November - Sunday 27th November
 08:00 to 16:00
 Tamping of new siding 1
 A tamping machine or ballast tamper is a machine used to pack (or tamp) the track ballast under railway tracks to make the tracks more durable.
 Install a temporary rail road access point at new siding, to enable us to access the track with the required machinery to undertake work.
 

Monday 28th November - Friday 2nd December
 07:00 - 15:00
 Monday to Wednesday
 Excavate spoil and unload onto engineering train.
 
 Thursday to Friday
 Unload and install 190 meters of ballast and install new sleepers to down siding 2.
 
 Saturday 3rd December - Monday 5th December
 23:00 - 09:00
 Deliver track switching and crossing into down siding 3. Move rail into down siding.
 
 Monday 5th December - Friday 9th December
 07:00 - 15:00
 Install new rails, switches and crossings for the down carriage siding 2, then unload and install new top ballast.
 
 Saturday 10th December - Monday 12th December
 23:00 - 04:45
 Excavate, reballast and install 60 meters of track to connect to new siding 2.
 Remove existing down siding 2 and transfer to engineering train. Lay 60 meters of top stone at south end of new siding 2.
 
 Monday 12th December - Tuesday 13th December
 07:00 - 15:00
 Tamping at new siding.
 Open new siding 2.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5319


View Profile
« Reply #2144 on: November 09, 2016, 13:05:24 »


So what would happen to the four or five class 387s that will no longer be able to take those services over?


The full number of 387s is still quite a few less than the originally intended total number of 387s and 365s.    My guess is that the reduced route mileage available to 387s, and the slight reduction in EMU (Electric Multiple Unit) numbers, will have been broadly allowed for by the recent increase in the number of GW (Great Western) spec 802s?

Paul
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 141 142 [143] 144 145 ... 176
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page