Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:55 26 Apr 2024
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
26th Apr (2016)
DOO strikes start on Southern (link)

Train RunningCancelled
16:00 Oxford to London Paddington
22:03 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 26, 2024, 14:03:18 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[140] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[127] access for all at Devon stations report
[55] Bonaparte's at Bristol Temple Meads
[34] Who we are - the people behind firstgreatwestern.info
[10] Lack of rolling stock due to attacks on shipping in the Red Se...
[6] Cornish delays
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: "Drivers 'losing out' to railways" BBC News 20/10/2009  (Read 2697 times)
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18923



View Profile
« on: October 20, 2009, 04:25:59 »

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page)
Quote
Motorists are getting a "raw deal" from the government, which is investing over 10 times more in rail than road travel, according to two campaign groups.

The Taxpayers' Alliance and the Drivers' Alliance say that spending per 1,000 passenger kilometres travelled is ^138.66 for rail and ^11.11 for road. They say drivers pay "huge amounts of tax" and deserve to have road investment prioritised.

But rail group Greengauge21 said funding new roads was "a mug's game".

'Double whammy'

The alliances based their calculation on total spending in 2007/08 of ^8.2bn on rail and ^8.3bn on roads. While those two figures are roughly similar, campaigners say 59 billion passenger kilometres were travelled by rail in that period, compared with 749 billion by road. Overall, they argue motorists paid ^30.3bn in fuel duty and Vehicle Excise Duty in 2007/08 - ^18.4bn more than was spent on improving the road network and offsetting the cost of road transport pollution combined.
   
Jennifer Dunn, policy analyst with the Drivers' Alliance and the Taxpayers' Alliance, said: "Motorists are getting a really raw deal thanks to the government's misguided transport policy. "Drivers suffer a double whammy - they pay huge amounts of tax, and only receive a disproportionately small share of transport spending."

Drivers' Alliance chief executive Peter Roberts said road spending must be prioritised if congestion was to be tackled. "Spending vast sums of drivers' taxes on extravagant rail projects will not address the immediate transport problems we have in the UK (United Kingdom)."   (.....continues)
« Last Edit: October 20, 2009, 04:35:12 by bignosemac » Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2009, 09:19:07 »

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page)
Quote
Motorists are getting a "raw deal" from the government, which is investing over 10 times more in rail than road travel, according to two campaign groups.

The Taxpayers' Alliance and the Drivers' Alliance say that spending per 1,000 passenger kilometres travelled is ^138.66 for rail and ^11.11 for road. They say drivers pay "huge amounts of tax" and deserve to have road investment prioritised.

But rail group Greengauge21 said funding new roads was "a mug's game".

'Double whammy'

The alliances based their calculation on total spending in 2007/08 of ^8.2bn on rail and ^8.3bn on roads. While those two figures are roughly similar, campaigners say 59 billion passenger kilometres were travelled by rail in that period, compared with 749 billion by road. Overall, they argue motorists paid ^30.3bn in fuel duty and Vehicle Excise Duty in 2007/08 - ^18.4bn more than was spent on improving the road network and offsetting the cost of road transport pollution combined.
   
Jennifer Dunn, policy analyst with the Drivers' Alliance and the Taxpayers' Alliance, said: "Motorists are getting a really raw deal thanks to the government's misguided transport policy. "Drivers suffer a double whammy - they pay huge amounts of tax, and only receive a disproportionately small share of transport spending."

Drivers' Alliance chief executive Peter Roberts said road spending must be prioritised if congestion was to be tackled. "Spending vast sums of drivers' taxes on extravagant rail projects will not address the immediate transport problems we have in the UK (United Kingdom)."   (.....continues)

Well done Greengauge21 for putting the rail industry's view forward.  What does ATOC» (Association of Train Operating Companies See - here) have to say? 
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: October 20, 2009, 16:44:33 »

Tim asks "What does ATOC» (Association of Train Operating Companies See - here) have to say? "

Probably nothing.
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 20, 2009, 17:08:23 »

Tim asks "What does ATOC» (Association of Train Operating Companies See - here) have to say? "

Probably nothing.
..which is the problem. 

The spending cuts will come and come they must.  But I have a real fear that rail will loose out because it lacks an effective unified voice. 

Logged
Cornish Traveller
Full Member
***
Posts: 62


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 08, 2009, 20:48:32 »

 Angry ATOC» (Association of Train Operating Companies See - here) might as well employ a budgie (or Maggie Thatcher  Roll Eyes  ) as spokesman LOL (laughing out loud) !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page