Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 07:35 26 Apr 2024
- Rail Britannia?
- Labour pledges to renationalise most rail services
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
26th Apr (2016)
DOO strikes start on Southern (link)

Train RunningCancelled
26/04/24 07:34 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
26/04/24 08:07 Didcot Parkway to Oxford
22:03 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
09:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 26, 2024, 07:41:59 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[193] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[102] access for all at Devon stations report
[56] Bonaparte's at Bristol Temple Meads
[34] Lack of rolling stock due to attacks on shipping in the Red Se...
[23] Cornish delays
[22] Theft from Severn Valley Railway
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: "Anger over rail fence gap" - South Wales Argus (22/12/2009)  (Read 11226 times)
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« on: December 22, 2009, 15:32:40 »

From the South Wales Argus:

Quote from: South Wales Argus
Anger over rail fence gap

A gap in a railway line fence needs to be blocked off as soon as possible to stop children from running across the tracks during the holidays, a councillor warns.

Councillor James Harris and Monmouthshire Council have called for Network Rail to fix a gap in a fence at Mill Reen in Undy, which they say is being used by children to walk across the tracks.

The company has placed a temporary mesh fence on the site, but Cllr Harris said a large gap remains.

Network Rail told Monmouthshire Council, which has advised the Health and Safety Executive of the situation, that it can not install a permanent fence until March 13.

Councillor Harris told the Argus the fencing usually stops people from accessing the railway line, which carries high speed traffic to the Severn Tunnel.

He^s worried the site is an accident waiting to happen over the school holidays.

^It^s wrong, March is a fair old length of time to wait to have this sorted,^ he said.

He said the mesh, installed by Network Rail last week, only covers the culvert and that the railway tracks are still accessible from either side.

A spokeswoman said the council raised concerns about the delay in light of the school holidays, and said there is clear evidence the area is being accessed by children.

^We^ve advised the HSE (Health and Safety Executive) of the situation and we have contacted Network Rail on a number of occasions to bring the date forward,^ she said.

A Network Rail spokeswoman said a temporary fence has been installed at the location, while a survey of the area is also taking place before a permanent fence is installed.

"Those who have witnessed any trespassers and vandals in the act are encouraged to ring the transport police," she said.
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 22, 2009, 16:57:16 »

Why not just make sure the kids don't cross the line. There wouldn't be a problem if the issue was tackled at its heart. Slap any trespassers with the full ^1000 penalty (or is it ^2000?) - would soon teach any trespassers a lesson.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4362


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 22, 2009, 17:02:33 »

If a Local Authority has such grave concerns they have a duty to take action, I suspect this is a Councilor throwing Teddy's out of his pram ...... is there local elections coming up this year in that area?
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
unfarepayingpassenger
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 19


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 12, 2010, 20:30:43 »

If anyone is killed or injured it will be blamed on Network Rail for failing to take sufficient action. It won't matter who is really at fault!
Logged
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: April 12, 2010, 20:47:54 »

the council should put up a fence now and charge it to network rail.... as for the education route well that will do little good when a kid runs across and dies
Logged
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 12, 2010, 22:10:56 »

Why don't the parents stop the children doing it in the first place?
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: April 12, 2010, 22:13:58 »

They should put a HARD HITTING advert out, none of this namby pamby rubbish like NR» (Network Rail - home page)'s last level crossing advert.

You need to be blunt and preferably some stomach churning images.

And then slap FULL fines, as D/M says, onto trespassers.
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: April 12, 2010, 22:32:15 »

Just come back from Germany, just watched passengers usually teenagers get of the train jump down a cross the line and exit station.

Now in both cases the line was the loop and in one case definitely disued but in the other may have been in use. However it seemed to be standard way out for them

For those of you that don't know one standard German station  layout is 2 through platforms and a loop accessible to/form both directions so a stopping train in either direction can be put in the loop and an ICE or IC (Inter City) . overtake. Also of course low platforms and no boundary fences.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 12, 2010, 23:11:40 »

There seem to be two ways to look at it.

Completely barrier all accesuble areas and take the rap when things go wrong;

Or

Give people responsibility to make the decision for themselves with only basic protection at more vulnerable areas, and in the event of any problems the railway is not at fault.

We seem to have strayed from the later to the former in recent times!
Logged
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: April 12, 2010, 23:34:06 »

There is also the issue of ... Well I won't swear but undesirables gaining access to steal equipment lay stuff on tracks play chicken or the other possible jumpers blocking off as many entrances as possible removes the temptation what ever the thinking or motive behind it is
Logged
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: April 12, 2010, 23:36:05 »

What are these peoples parents thinking of? Let alone what are these people thinking of...
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: April 12, 2010, 23:54:36 »

It does seem odd doesn't it?

Never once in my teenage years have I been tempted to trespass on railway lines/steal equipment and I wouldn't class my upbringing as anything out of the ordinary.

Brings home some of the clear social issues that exist in this country.
Logged
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: April 12, 2010, 23:59:44 »

Well yes I tend to agree..

My children have had it instilled in them to go nowhere near the railway line even if their friends want them to... And there is plenty of opportunity in Maidenhead since the trains go right through the middle of it :-)
Logged
matt473
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 374


View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: April 13, 2010, 00:30:11 »

Sadly a gap or not in a rail fence will make no difference. You would be surprised how many people assume no trains run at all. I have lived in a South Wales town called Ammanford for many years on the Heart of Wales line and there are many people both young and old that use it as a walkway as they still refuse to accept trains run along the line despite having proper fencing all along the route. Worse still there is a branh line that diverts of the line nearby up the Amman Valley to serve a local coal mine that now sees a freight train travel along it every other day and children regularly play on the line despite Network Rail sending a letter to all local schools to inform children that trains are running on the line and to keep away for safety. Despite this people still of course use the railway as a walkway as a shortcut home.

As I have been taught and everyone should be, if a railway line is in place, assume a train will use it otherwise why else would it be there?
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: April 13, 2010, 09:22:11 »

the council should put up a fence now and charge it to network rail.... as for the education route well that will do little good when a kid runs across and dies

A non-starter I think.  Council can't put up a fence on NR» (Network Rail - home page) land and if it did its workers would be trespassers themselves and possibly in danger. 

All the Council can do is appeal to NR which is what it is doing.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page