Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 22:15 29 Apr 2024
- Met to pay damages to French publisher over arrest
- Power cut causes disruption at Stansted Airport
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Apr (1973)
Patent award for Janney (Buckeye) coupling (*)

Train RunningDelayed
19:18 London Paddington to Swansea
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 29, 2024, 22:25:43 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[145] Where was I today, 29.04.24?
[109] Clan Line - by Clan Line !
[93] South Western Railways Waterloo - Bristol services axed
[92] Saturdays: Rochdale / Manchester onto the Settle and Carlisle
[57] Visiting the pub on the way home.
[34] Disabled access at Cholsey: time for a campaign!
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: District Line disruption due to Network Rail problem!  (Read 6186 times)
James Vertigan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 256


View Profile WWW Email
« on: January 25, 2010, 10:16:47 »

I know it's not to do with FGW (First Great Western), but:

Quote
Severe delays are occurring between Putney Bridge and Wimbledon, with minor delays between Putney Bridge and Earl's Court due to ongoing Network Rail power supply problems.

Never seen this excuse before - blaming someone else!

They don't share the same lines do they, so I wouldn't think they'd share the same power supply.. but clearly they do.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40845



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: January 25, 2010, 10:21:37 »

There's someting odd about that "end" of the district line - aren't there a few SWT (South West Trains) trains that use it from Clapham Junction to Wimbledon, via the "Windsor lines".   I suspect a similar excuse could be used from Gunnersbury to Richmond.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
James Vertigan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 256


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: January 25, 2010, 10:35:03 »

There's someting odd about that "end" of the district line - aren't there a few SWT (South West Trains) trains that use it from Clapham Junction to Wimbledon, via the "Windsor lines".   I suspect a similar excuse could be used from Gunnersbury to Richmond.

Although that bit of line is now under TFL (Transport for London) control, is it not, with it being London Overground - or do they come under Network Rail as well?
Logged
RailCornwall
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 642


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 25, 2010, 10:45:21 »

Still uses Network Rail infrastructure to run on though, LOROL (London Overground Railway Operations Ltd) being a 'glorified' franchise administered by TFL (Transport for London).
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5319


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 25, 2010, 10:55:30 »

There is a lot of history to the Wimbledon section, but basically from an infrastructure technology point of view it is still a NR» (Network Rail - home page) line from the junction at East Putney station. At one time the boundary was on the north side of Putney Bridge IIRC (if I recall/remember/read correctly).  When it was transferred to LU ownership at privatisation, that was all that changed. The electrical supplies and signalling are still Network Rail technology, and maintained and operated by them.  There is a project to separate all the mixed up LU and NR electrical supplies because NR want to raise the line voltage for the 10/12 car projects, but can't yet where they also provide power to LU. As pointed out SWT (South West Trains) have running rights over this section, and use it fairly regularly for ECS (Empty Coaching Stock), and also maintain a couple of in service trains that way for route knowledge purposes.  On a couple of occasions in 2008 SWT used it for the whole weekend and half the District trains were cancelled to make room. The line speed is lower for mainline units than LU trains, because the latter have better braking and are protected by LU trainstops.

As well as LO/LU to Richmond which could be described as LU running on an NR(LO) line there are various control permutations with the LU/LO 'DC (Direct Current) Lines' (Euston - Watford).  The rest of the NLL is normal NR, and will remain so.

There are a couple of odd aspects with the newly rebuilt ELL - operation of the electrical supplies is going to be done by Lewisham Electrical Control Office (ECO (Electrical Control Officer)), and the signalling is going to be operated by NR signallers, sitting in a London Rail owned signalling centre at New Cross Gate. This makes operational sense because of the service frequency of 12 tph running onto NR tracks.

Simples...

Paul
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: January 25, 2010, 11:04:36 »

Paul has put it better and beat me to teh post but here goes on my take.

Railcornwall is right Netwrokrail is responsible for the power supply, trrack and signalling (new Waterloo) betweem East Putney and Wimbledon. If I remember correctly from my days in Waterloo there are special isolating sections between East Putney and Putney Bridge to isolate the power supplies.

As well as ECS (Empty Coaching Stock) the following SWT (South West Trains) passenger trains use the line.

Point Pleasant Junction - East Putney (152,155,158) WH
0454 SuX Basingstoke - Waterloo
0105 SX Waterloo - Southampton Central
0042 SX Waterloo - Strawberry Hill

Courtesy of PSUL website http://www.avoe05.dsl.pipex.com/2010.htm

Well worth a look.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4362


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 25, 2010, 16:50:58 »

The traction current for this line is provided by NR» (Network Rail - home page), I not been in the office today to know what the exact problem is there are plans to renew rectifiers and HV switch gear in that area to separate it from the NR main lines so that the NR lines can be up rated to 750 v DC (Direct Current) leaving LUL (London Underground Ltd) at 660 v DC this is all to do with the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) requirement on NR to introduce regen breaking which can raise the potential on the third rail to close on 1000 volts LUL stock is not designed for this level (an boy would they go fast  Grin )

It could be a rectifier failed (unlikely as the system can loose 2 in that part of the world) could be a high voltage feeder has failed or a problem with Wimbledon Grid or just a good old fashioned someone has nicked the signaling cables
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
James Vertigan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 256


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #7 on: January 26, 2010, 15:07:20 »

Seems the problems are continuing today between Wimbledon-Putney Bridge.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4362


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: January 29, 2010, 15:46:51 »

There was a faulty 33,000 volt feeder in the area, these are oil filled feeders which require specialist jointer's and take quite a few hours to joint, that is once you've located where the fault is and got all the kit there issued safety documentation
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page