Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:55 28 Apr 2024
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Apr (1963)
Bristol Bus Boycott announced (*)

Train RunningDelayed
23:03 Reading to Gatwick Airport
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 29, 2024, 00:10:55 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[129] Clan Line - by Clan Line !
[111] Visiting the pub on the way home.
[41] South Western Railways Waterloo - Bristol services axed
[39] access for all at Devon stations report
[25] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[20] Misleading advertising?
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 193 194 [195] 196 197 ... 230
  Print  
Author Topic: Reading Station improvements  (Read 1363860 times)
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #2910 on: November 01, 2014, 09:19:25 »

You may have spotted the new concrete coping, still being fitted. Its striking feature is the slope across it. Now, is that to discourage walking along it, and falling off on the downstairs side? There a biggish drop.

Is it possibly arranged to divert rainwater to one side - perhaps with the lower height for it to drip to the ground?

Paul
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4453


View Profile
« Reply #2911 on: November 01, 2014, 09:31:00 »

You may have spotted the new concrete coping, still being fitted. Its striking feature is the slope across it. Now, is that to discourage walking along it, and falling off on the downstairs side? There a biggish drop.

Is it possibly arranged to divert rainwater to one side - perhaps with the lower height for it to drip to the ground?

Paul

It is indeed if it was to discourage walking it would be that very pointed slope used on bridge parapets over electrified lines. 
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7172


View Profile
« Reply #2912 on: November 02, 2014, 00:20:40 »

You may have spotted the new concrete coping, still being fitted. Its striking feature is the slope across it. Now, is that to discourage walking along it, and falling off on the downstairs side? There a biggish drop.

Is it possibly arranged to divert rainwater to one side - perhaps with the lower height for it to drip to the ground?

Paul

It is indeed if it was to discourage walking it would be that very pointed slope used on bridge parapets over electrified lines. 

Like everything else, there's a lot of technicalities behind it if you look. Apparently keeping water out of the tops of walls is one of many aspects of building where twentieth-century practice is now found wanting. For masonry (including brick) walls you now need a damp-proof course under the coping, as well as a slope to shed the water. For this cast concrete wall there is no sign of a DPC, but I guess you'd still want a waterproof mastic seal between coping units.

Apparently it is usual for parapet copings to have this slope ("single weathered"), as well as a drip edge ("throating") each side. I can see that for a roof parapet, but I'm sure most times I've leant on a path or terrace parapet, even an old traditional one, it's been almost level. Hence my noting it looked odd in that location, and having leant on it is feels odd too. Maybe modern, uniform, best practice isn't just a return to tradition.
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #2913 on: November 04, 2014, 20:09:59 »

Some photographs of the new south-side station approach 'square' can be found here: https://www.flickr.com/groups/1945836@N21/pool/

Looks quite smart now (for Reading anyway Cheesy ) but I do wish they would clean up that graffiti on the old Western Tower building (its been there for years now).
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #2914 on: November 04, 2014, 21:18:29 »

One of the buildings that lets the whole area down is the GW (Great Western) Staff Association.   Wonder who the landlord is...

Paul
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4453


View Profile
« Reply #2915 on: November 09, 2014, 22:03:28 »

Latest photos on Flickr show that the signalling is now powered on the viaduct. https://www.flickr.com/groups/1945836@N21/pool/

Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #2916 on: November 10, 2014, 09:03:08 »

Having just done an article on the Reading Viaduct for my club magazine, it's struck me that Reading is actually becoming a real Hbf!

There is grade separation at both East and West ends of the  station and 9 through platforms

Now all we need is grade separation at Southcote Jn and 4 tracks from there to Reading West.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7172


View Profile
« Reply #2917 on: November 10, 2014, 09:26:00 »

Having just done an article on the Reading Viaduct for my club magazine, it's struck me that Reading is actually becoming a real Hbf!

There is grade separation at both East and West ends of the  station and 9 through platforms

Now all we need is grade separation at Southcote Jn and 4 tracks from there to Reading West.

I'm not sure you could justify running a Reading S-Bahn - even with a station at Green Park.
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #2918 on: November 10, 2014, 14:42:32 »

Why not? The A33 is heavily congested at peak times Bramley has expanded with houses on the ammo dump and you could have a station where the line crosses the A33 in North Basingstoke to serve the retail park.
Logged
4064ReadingAbbey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 455


View Profile
« Reply #2919 on: November 10, 2014, 17:45:17 »

An S-Bahn with two routes: Wokingham - Newbury and Henley - Basingstoke...

You read it here first!
Logged
DidcotPunter
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 166


View Profile Email
« Reply #2920 on: November 10, 2014, 18:15:43 »

With Crossrail Reading will be on the end of rather a long S-Bahn line. Not much use for the town itself though other than for a stopping service to Maidenhead and Slough.
Logged
CCTV99
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 27


View Profile
« Reply #2921 on: November 15, 2014, 16:01:00 »

I'm sorry, but I'm not going to trawl back through 195 pages to see if the info is there. So if anyone is able to answer my question i'd be most grateful.

Q. What are the new platform lengths for Platforms 7 to 15 ?

Many thanks in anticipation.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #2922 on: November 15, 2014, 18:00:20 »

I'm sorry, but I'm not going to trawl back through 195 pages to see if the info is there. So if anyone is able to answer my question i'd be most grateful.

Q. What are the new platform lengths for Platforms 7 to 15 ?

Many thanks in anticipation.

7 - 304m
8 - 307m (not sure if this is temporary, as it is expected it will be lengthened to the west alongside WH Smiths during the Christmas blockade)
9 - 303m
10 - 320m
11 - 306m
12-15 All 282m

Those are operational lengths as shown in the (09 Mar 14 update) online GW (Great Western) sectional appendix - as you can see from the P10/11 figures this can/will differ from the physical length of the platform island due to signal positioning etc.

HTH

Paul
Logged
CCTV99
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 27


View Profile
« Reply #2923 on: November 15, 2014, 22:44:57 »

Many thanks for replying Paul.
Logged
CCTV99
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 27


View Profile
« Reply #2924 on: November 27, 2014, 21:21:40 »

Only 4 weeks to go, before the blockade over Christmas and New Year.
Can anyone clarify the extent of all the work due to be completed over this period?

Apart from connecting up the viaduct lines, how much passive provision is going to be installed for connecting up the remaining phases at a later stage, e.g. the Feeder lines etc?


   
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 193 194 [195] 196 197 ... 230
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page