Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 05:55 29 Apr 2024
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Apr (1963)
Bristol Bus Boycott announced (*)

Train RunningShort Run
09:23 London Paddington to Oxford
14:02 Oxford to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 29, 2024, 06:02:10 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[121] Visiting the pub on the way home.
[98] Clan Line - by Clan Line !
[25] South Western Railways Waterloo - Bristol services axed
[24] access for all at Devon stations report
[15] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[12] Misleading advertising?
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: No lights inside train  (Read 3104 times)
matt473
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 374


View Profile Email
« on: May 09, 2010, 16:03:38 »

On a 158 from Cardiff to Temple Meads there were no lights on inside the train. Not a problem usually but moving slowly through the tunnel before Newport and the Severn Tunnel meant the train was in darkness for some time. Is this allowed day to day or is it a faulty set still running as a train with no lights is better than a cancelled service? There were people feelng uneasy about the darkness so I'm guesing this wasn't meant to happen otherwise it is poor customer service
Logged
thetrout
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2612



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 09, 2010, 16:06:50 »

I'm 98% sure that that was actually illegal and against every H&S (Health and Safety) rule in the book...! That carriage should have been locked out of use...! Maybe worthy of an e-mail/letter to FGW (First Great Western)??
Logged

Grin Grin Grin Grin
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17895


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: May 09, 2010, 17:11:04 »

Hmm.  We've had similar discussions about the lack of lighting in carriages in the Severn Tunnel area before: see http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=3584.0
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Brucey
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2260


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: May 09, 2010, 17:16:08 »

About a year ago, I was on a Portsmouth - Cardiff 158 with no lighting in the centre coach.  It was becoming dark as we arrived at Southampton.  The guard "recommended" people move to the other carriages.  A SWT (South West Trains) engineer boarded at Salisbury but didn't fix the problem.  The guard simply recommended that people use the other two carriages "unless they didn't mind sitting in the dark".
Logged
smithy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 09, 2010, 18:20:48 »

at a guess i would say it had a charging fault or main light mcb had tripped,as far as i am aware the carriage should not be used if in darkness however if it was not simply a tripped mcb the train crew could have operated the remote supply in middle car to give emergency lighting,providing it was not 798 then the light sticks should have been operated.
this leads me to believe the crew were unaware of the fault???
Logged
northwesterntrains
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 324


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: May 10, 2010, 11:58:41 »

Northern use 142s with lights that don't work or are faulty and only work part of the time. 

I can't imagine operators should be allowed to use trains in long tunnels which have broken lights.  Long tunnels that come to mind are the Severn tunnel, Standedge tunnel and Mersey tunnel, but they're probably many more.
Logged
Brucey
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2260


View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: May 30, 2010, 19:54:45 »

But isn't the Standedge tunnel a canal tunnel?
According to the reliable source that is Wikipedia, there are several tunnels.  One of these carries the canal with the others being railway tunnels.
Logged
The Grecian
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 176


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 30, 2010, 21:41:47 »

Just to clarify there are four Standedge tunnels: one for the canal, a double track bore and two single track bores. Since the 60s only the double bore has been used for trains. The same was true for the Woodhead tunnels until the double bore closed in 1981.

To get back to a semblance of relevance, I suspect it would be frowned upon if Northern or Trans-Pennine Express moved passenger services through the tunnel without lighting on a regular basis - the speed limit is 60mph I think so it takes 3 minutes minimum to get through.
Logged
James Vertigan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 256


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #8 on: May 30, 2010, 22:32:17 »

I'm 98% sure that that was actually illegal and against every H&S (Health and Safety) rule in the book...! That carriage should have been locked out of use...! Maybe worthy of an e-mail/letter to FGW (First Great Western)??

Try telling this to the North York Moors Railway!

OK, they may not fall under Network Rail jurisdiction, and they may only have one tunnel on the route which isn't your average Box Tunnel lenghth tunnel, but I was up there earlier in the month with my parents and we went on the NYMR (North Yorkshire Moors Railway), and during the in the tunnel bit of the journey, despite there being lights in the carriages, they were not turned on on either the outward or return journey.
Logged
The SprinterMeister
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 665


Trundling round the SW

Chris64ex4@hotmail.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: June 06, 2010, 21:53:52 »

On a 158 from Cardiff to Temple Meads there were no lights on inside the train. Not a problem usually but moving slowly through the tunnel before Newport and the Severn Tunnel meant the train was in darkness for some time. Is this allowed day to day or is it a faulty set still running as a train with no lights is better than a cancelled service? There were people feelng uneasy about the darkness so I'm guesing this wasn't meant to happen otherwise it is poor customer service

I assume that the engine was running on the involved vehicle?

Running a train without lights in one coach is a far lesser evil than cancelling a train completely due to there being no train availble to replace it. This would also affect the loadings on other trains and also the next working for the train with no lights in one vehicle. Passengers should not normally be conveyed in the vehicle without lights in it although this is difficult to enforce on trains with no lockable gangway doors between coaches in the set.

On a class 158, loss of lights is commonly caused by low auxilary battery voltage due to the 'Alternator Excitation' circuit breaker having tripped. This is sometimes caused by loss of hydrostatic oil in the system that runs the radiator fans, the air con and the alternator. In fact loss of oil is generally found to be the problem if the circuit breaker trips repeatedly with the train saloon lights turned off in order to reset it.
Logged

Trundling gently round the SW
smithy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 07, 2010, 20:57:49 »

On a 158 from Cardiff to Temple Meads there were no lights on inside the train. Not a problem usually but moving slowly through the tunnel before Newport and the Severn Tunnel meant the train was in darkness for some time. Is this allowed day to day or is it a faulty set still running as a train with no lights is better than a cancelled service? There were people feelng uneasy about the darkness so I'm guesing this wasn't meant to happen otherwise it is poor customer service

I assume that the engine was running on the involved vehicle?

Running a train without lights in one coach is a far lesser evil than cancelling a train completely due to there being no train availble to replace it. This would also affect the loadings on other trains and also the next working for the train with no lights in one vehicle. Passengers should not normally be conveyed in the vehicle without lights in it although this is difficult to enforce on trains with no lockable gangway doors between coaches in the set.

On a class 158, loss of lights is commonly caused by low auxilary battery voltage due to the 'Alternator Excitation' circuit breaker having tripped. This is sometimes caused by loss of hydrostatic oil in the system that runs the radiator fans, the air con and the alternator. In fact loss of oil is generally found to be the problem if the circuit breaker trips repeatedly with the train saloon lights turned off in order to reset it.


since refresh it is possible to gain emergency lighting with no charging by tripping the remote supply on the 158 fleet with the exception of 58715 car of 798.if it is loss of hydro oil then engine should be isolated.
it has been known for the AVR board or mag amp to cause alt mcb to trip aswell as low engine rpm
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page