TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Posts: 6438
The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!
|
|
« Reply #60 on: January 21, 2013, 22:25:53 » |
|
Bullsh*t. Something the HSE▸ sent in 2010 and also features on several county council websites... It is very unlikely that you would face any legal liability, as long as you are careful, and use common sense to ensure that you do not make the pavement or pathway clearly more dangerous than before. People using areas affected by snow and ice also have responsibility to be careful themselves. It's 20 years since I studied law. I remember one of the leading cases was a town hall whose steps were cleared of snow, but not properly. Ebrown is right to point out that whatever is done must be done properly. I'm sure FGW▸ will make sure the car park is as safe as it can be. As Oxman pointed out, there is a lot of clearing to be done by a finite number of people. Platforms will be priority number one, the car park will get done in due course. Clearing a car park of snow is hard work. To whoever does it - a big thank you.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Now, please!
|
|
|
johoare
|
|
« Reply #61 on: January 21, 2013, 22:43:07 » |
|
Maidenhead platforms were clear by Friday night (And a bit thank you to who did that).. It is now Monday evening.. I'm pretty sure they are waiting for the car park snow to melt.. As you will see if you read my initial post.. It looks as if maybe FGW▸ /APCOA▸ contract out the clearing/gritting of car parks? Though I don't know if that is true or not.. The on-line advertiser still doesn't have the letter on btw or I'd post a link..
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
gpn01
|
|
« Reply #62 on: January 21, 2013, 23:17:45 » |
|
Maidenhead platforms this morning hadn't been cleared (well platform 2 anyway - too early in the morning to look at the others!). One of the staff was making the effort around 7am to clear the snow from the yellow line - presumably so that when the announcer said "please stand behind the yellow line" you'd have an idea where it was.
Shoppenhangars car park was a scene from winter wonderland with no evidence of gritting, etc.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NickB
|
|
« Reply #63 on: January 23, 2013, 09:06:47 » |
|
It had to happen to me didn't it ?!?! Parked up at Shoppenhangers this morning, gingerly walked to the station and slipped straight over. Blood pouring out of a 3" gash to my hand and others on my leg. Notified the station staff who pulled the 'nothing to do with us gov' approach. Called APCOA▸ who sent me to FGW▸ , who confirmed it is their responsibility. Waiting for a call back from head office. I love commuting. Its so much fun.
|
|
« Last Edit: January 23, 2013, 09:24:46 by NickB »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Oxman
|
|
« Reply #64 on: January 23, 2013, 12:14:32 » |
|
The attitude of the station staff is completely unacceptable and entirely contrary to the rules, which state that every accident must be recorded on a form RAF01 and noted in the station accident log. Form RAF01 includes sections to be completed by the station manager re inspection of the site and rectification of hazards found. All staff are briefed on this procedure at least annually.
The RAF01 is sent to the Safety department and checked there. Actions are recorded on a database and the Station Manager must then report on progress. The database will flag up open actions, so there is no escape.
Follow it through and find out why this procedure was not followed. Also ask what action is being taken to make the area safe.
By the way, if you had gone to hospital, the accident would have been Riddor reportable and the Station Manager would have had to produce a report within 72 hours.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
johoare
|
|
« Reply #65 on: January 23, 2013, 20:37:01 » |
|
It had to happen to me didn't it ?!?! Parked up at Shoppenhangers this morning, gingerly walked to the station and slipped straight over. Blood pouring out of a 3" gash to my hand and others on my leg. Notified the station staff who pulled the 'nothing to do with us gov' approach. Called APCOA▸ who sent me to FGW▸ , who confirmed it is their responsibility. Waiting for a call back from head office. I love commuting. Its so much fun. And all someone had to do in the last five days or so.. Was grit the car park... assuming it was the car park you fell over in? I am very interested to know what FGW say about that (whether the car park is their responsibility or if not someone elses, but it is still in FGWs interest).. Hope you're ok NickB?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
johoare
|
|
« Reply #66 on: January 23, 2013, 22:55:33 » |
|
The attitude of the station staff is completely unacceptable and entirely contrary to the rules, which state that every accident must be recorded on a form RAF01 and noted in the station accident log. Form RAF01 includes sections to be completed by the station manager re inspection of the site and rectification of hazards found. All staff are briefed on this procedure at least annually.
The RAF01 is sent to the Safety department and checked there. Actions are recorded on a database and the Station Manager must then report on progress. The database will flag up open actions, so there is no escape.
Follow it through and find out why this procedure was not followed. Also ask what action is being taken to make the area safe.
By the way, if you had gone to hospital, the accident would have been Riddor reportable and the Station Manager would have had to produce a report within 72 hours.
Not sure if you know or not Oxman but the car park this post was about is a little way from the station, and includes a public footpath/road to get there. I don't know but is the station Manager responsible for remote from the station locations as this?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Oxman
|
|
« Reply #67 on: January 23, 2013, 23:58:13 » |
|
I don't know the geography of the area, but was going on the admission from FGW▸ (as reported by NickB) that it is responsible for the car park. If this is the case, then the Station Manager will be the local manager responsible for the site.
APCOA▸ was, until a few years ago, contracted to treat car parks, although the contract was unsatisfactory in its scope. APCOA was relieved of its responsibilities when Mitie was contracted to provide gritting and snow clearance.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NickB
|
|
« Reply #68 on: January 24, 2013, 09:25:38 » |
|
Morning, Thanks for your concern johoare - my cuts and scrapes will mend, although I've got rather a stiff neck still. To clarify where/what happened it was indeed in the carpark, on the slope down towards the (unmanned) ticket booth. I went down with a bang! After my unsuccessful attempt to report it at the station I called the FGW▸ CarParks line, they then passed me to the main Customer Helpline. Both operators confirmed that FGW own and are responsible for the Maidnehead carparks and that APCOA▸ only collect revenue. As an aside, to cover myself I also emailed APCOA but they have been silent so far. FGW asked me to supply the details in writing or email, marking for attention of a particular person. I did this yesterday morning, but no response yet. What was quite interesting was that the Customer Services person was in some ways more concerned about the dismissal I received at the station rather than the incident itself. I guess Oxman's comments demonstrate where the station staff were amiss. If anything interesting happens I'll keep you updated.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
johoare
|
|
« Reply #69 on: January 24, 2013, 22:51:12 » |
|
I may be wrong but I think your reply from Apcoa (if you get one at all) is that they don't deal with complaints by email..
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
johoare
|
|
« Reply #70 on: January 29, 2013, 16:41:34 » |
|
I had a slightly strange answering phone message from Network rail today to say that "the works" that I had enquired about would be scheduled either for 2013 or 2014 depending on funding...Having said that it looks like they might have started sorting the drains out today (or they are doing something else.. it's hard to tell)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
johoare
|
|
« Reply #71 on: February 04, 2013, 22:28:05 » |
|
Tonight at 8.15 I got back to Silco drive car park to find it without lights.. I can only imagine that isn't safe for anyone? I imagine Network Rail are most likely responsible for that and so I won't get response should I complain.. I also imagine/can tell from previous posts of mine that no one here is that bothered unless they use that car park... but... it is quite important that people can get to their cars relatively safely surely? I for one won't want to use it until it is sorted which might not be anytime soon...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #72 on: February 04, 2013, 23:27:21 » |
|
Hmm. It really isn't very good, is it, Jo? I can't find anything useful in the way of possible contacts at Network Rail, other than to suggest that you telephone their helpline (open 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, apparently!) on 08457 11 41 41 - and keep on at them until the matter is escalated to someone who will do something about it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #74 on: February 05, 2013, 01:00:18 » |
|
Lighting issues would get a much higher priority than puddles/lakes, and are likely to be much easier to fix.
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
|
|
|
|