Train Graphic
Great Western Passengers' Forum Great Western Coffee Shop - [home] and [about]
Read about the forum [here]. Register and contribute [here] - it's free.
Random Image
Train Running @GWR Twitter Acronyms/Abbreviations Station Comparator Rail News GWR co. site Site Style 1 2 3 4 Chat on off
August 19, 2018, 04:21:39 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most liked recent subjects
[138] Class 802s
[74] Imber bus
[41] GWR mobile tickets
[18] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[16] MetroBus
[13] Princes Risborough to Chinnor
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Heathrow Airtrack Waterloo rail link shelved by BAA  (Read 6008 times)
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17406


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« on: April 11, 2011, 08:09:05 pm »

From the BBC:

Quote
A controversial rail link from Heathrow's Terminal 5 through south west London has been shelved due to a lack of money, according to the BAA.

The ^675m line would have connected the airport terminal to Reading, Guildford and London Waterloo stations.

BAA said its decision to withdraw the rail link application followed concerns raised over level crossings delays.

"We have been unable to develop solutions which fully address these concerns," BAA said.

Richmond council had opposed the scheme due to increased congestion it said would occur at barriers at Barnes, Mortlake and North Sheen.

Heathrow's surface access director Allan Gregory said: "We've listened to the concerns raised by local residents about the impact of Airtrack and worked hard to try and resolve issues including level crossings. Despite our considerable efforts, including discussions with Network Rail and the local highway authorities, we have been unable to develop solutions which fully address these concerns."

He added the project was also cancelled due to lack of funds. "We have considered alternative scheme options and how these might be funded but in the absence of securing additional funding in the current economic climate, Heathrow Airport is unable to justify meeting the full cost of the project," he said.

Richmond council is yet to comment on the cancellation of the scheme.
Logged

William Huskisson MP was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
ChrisB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 9539


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: April 11, 2011, 09:22:20 pm »

I wonder whether there'll be any changes to the REading remodelling - wasn't at least one of the new southern platforms meant specifically for AirTrack?....
Logged
Electric train
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2944


The future is 25,000 Volts a.c.


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 11, 2011, 09:32:00 pm »

The issue with the level crossing is, if I recall correctly, the barriers would be down more than they would be up something like 40 minuets in every hour the crossing would be closed to road traffic
Logged

Mark Carne 26 June 2015 - "The challenges of delivering myriad improvement projects while still running a railway seven days a week were simply overwhelming".
bignosemac
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 15796


Question everything.


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 11, 2011, 10:25:53 pm »

And at more than one crossing. Three crossings in the Egham/Staines area and one in Wokingham were predicted to be severely affected, being closed for more than 50% of the time in each hour 0700-1900.

http://www.heathrowairport.com/assets/Internet/Heathrow/Heathrow%20downloads/Static%20files/ES_Volume2_Level_Crossing-Effects_Heathrow_Airtrack.pdf
Logged

Former FGW/GWR regular passenger. No more. Despicable company.
Ollie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2243


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: April 12, 2011, 01:48:57 am »

Wokingham has 3 level crossings, would have been a nightmare, particularly the one by the station which has an awful road layout and if AirTrack went ahead would have been used by FGW/SWT/AirTrack - and that random AXC service
Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6787



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 05, 2012, 09:56:05 am »

There is an article in the latest Modern Railways which suggests an Airtrack Lite scheme is being proposed. It involves four trains an hour from London Waterloo to Staines and thence to the airport via a new chord. Two of the trains would be new. The other two would be Windsor services which would divide at Staines.

The bit I cannot quite follow is the suggestion in the article that it would be part of the Great Western tender documents. It seems in the heart of SWT land to me.
Logged
eightf48544
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4069


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: June 05, 2012, 03:10:15 pm »

Perhaps they are getting muddled with the Western Link from T5 to the GWML which could be in the tender documents.
Logged
paul7755
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4457


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 05, 2012, 03:56:41 pm »

Perhaps they are getting muddled with the Western Link from T5 to the GWML which could be in the tender documents.

Does seems to be a Modern Railways error in directly combining the two schemes. 

The GW consultation simply says:  "Western rail access to Heathrow ^ an initial study is under way, and this access could be in use by 2020 if it can be successfully incorporated with the other major works in the area."   

I suppose it depends on what they assumed was meant by 'other major works in the area' - personally I suspect it's a reference to Stockley Jn, Crossrail, and GWML electrification and resignalling - MR may have thought of Airtrack Lite?

Paul
Logged
Southern Stag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 984


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 05, 2012, 04:20:46 pm »

Saw this on the FGW website regarding the western link at Heathrow. Unusual to see FGW calling for an infrastructure improvement in this way.

http://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/About-Us/Media-centre/MP-calls-for-direct-rail-link-from-the-West-to-Heathrow
Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1341


View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: June 06, 2012, 12:25:08 am »

Why all this talk of a new project, linking to Heathrow from other directions, when the currently planned, and even more important, major GWML project (electrification) is a half-hearted botch-job?

Isn't there a much cheaper means of providing a western rail access to Heathrow? What, other than the lack of electrification, is to stop a Reading - Heathrow service being introduced now (reversing at Hayes & Harlington, or whatever the first station reached after airport junction (heading east) is)?
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
Southern Stag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 984


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 06, 2012, 01:57:15 am »

Reversing at Hayes & Harlington would use up too much capacity whilst you stopped and reversed, I'm not sure that there is the correct signalling at the moment either.
Logged
eightf48544
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4069


View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: June 06, 2012, 09:01:31 am »

Platform 4 is   bidirectionally signalled form Southall West to and ther is a crossover to the Down Relief and Up Heathrow West of the station, plus the necessary signal at the west end of Platform 4.
 
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants