Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:35 29 Apr 2024
* Depardieu in custody over sexual assault allegations
- End of the road for 'Banksie' pothole campaigner
* Pete Waterman's team breaks model railway record
* Power cut causes disruption at Stansted Airport
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Apr (1963)
Bristol Bus Boycott announced (*)

Train RunningCancelled
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
14:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
15:34 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
16:07 Didcot Parkway to Oxford
16:35 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
17:04 Didcot Parkway to Moreton-In-Marsh
17:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
18:51 Evesham to Oxford
Short Run
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:02 Oxford to London Paddington
Delayed
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 29, 2024, 13:54:08 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[154] Clan Line - by Clan Line !
[57] Visiting the pub on the way home.
[53] Saturdays: Rochdale / Manchester onto the Settle and Carlisle
[47] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[44] Cornish delays
[12] South Western Railways Waterloo - Bristol services axed
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Horse box wedged under bridge near Burnham station (Maidenhead Advertiser 27/08)  (Read 4752 times)
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18924



View Profile
« on: August 26, 2011, 12:15:09 »

From the Maidenhead Advertiser:

Quote
A horse box became wedged under a bridge near Burnham train station on Sunday, leading to fresh calls from residents concerned about its safety.

Station Road was closed for about an hour-and-a-half after the trailer smashed into a beam along the top of the bridge at about 4pm.

More than 20 residents gathered to watch as two fire crews from Slough attempted to free it. A horse was trapped inside for nearly an hour before eventually being released unharmed.

In August last year the steel beam was installed and a permanent traffic order enforced preventing vehicles more than 2.5m high from passing through.

Regular collisions into the bridge had caused Network Rail to become concerned about its strength.

Hazel Shackleton, of nearby Sandringham Court, said: "Since they changed the bridge there are constantly accidents and someone's going to be seriously injured if nothing's done about it."

A Network Rail spokesman said: "The height of this bridge is well signposted in advance and on the bridge itself, and it is the responsibility of drivers to make sure they follow the rules of the road."
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: August 26, 2011, 13:50:58 »

Good to see the "Magdeburg Solution" working, large steel beam in front of actual bridge work. Thus lorry hits beam before bridge. Hopefull preventing damge to road bridge and allowing trains to continue running. Should be installed in front of all low bridges. Cost peanuts save millions in delays.

My view is drivers should be automatically prosceuted and maybe banned from driving. Maybe Take away HGV or PSV licence.

Plus at last a robust response from Networkrail.

Magdeburg solution is my name after seeing such beams in front of low bridges in Magdeburg in 1996. they also have another even more drastic solution 600V tram wires. That I'd like to see more of this country because it would mean more trams, the finest form of inner urban transport, and before any says that they impede the traffic that's why they are so good!
« Last Edit: August 26, 2011, 13:56:26 by eightf48544 » Logged
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1723


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 26, 2011, 17:43:14 »

Magdeburg solution is my name after seeing such beams in front of low bridges in Magdeburg in 1996. they also have another even more drastic solution 600V tram wires. That I'd like to see more of this country because it would mean more trams, the finest form of inner urban transport, and before any says that they impede the traffic that's why they are so good!
Alas, City of Edinburgh Council is destroying the case for trams single-handed. For the latest, see http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-14678578 - the trams will only operate from the Airport to Haymarket station. Digging up Princes Street was (a) pointless and (b) apparently needs to be done again (!). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yOqU4-zE5w has the usual Hitler rant - "^500 million quid to replace the number 22 bus".
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17895


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: August 27, 2011, 23:12:32 »

Quote
... has the usual Hitler rant - "^500 million quid to replace the number 22 bus".

Cough, splutter ...  Wink Cheesy Grin
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page