Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 07:35 03 May 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
3rd May (1954)
Lochluichart new station opens (link)

Train RunningCancelled
06:50 Frome to Bristol Temple Meads
15:01 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
22:15 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
Short Run
12:13 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
13:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
14:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 03, 2025, 07:45:12 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[254] Subtle train time changes
[103] In memory of the Weymouth Harbour Tramway on the anniversary o...
[71] Service reduction - Coombe Junction
[61] A very easy riddle
[29] Steam excursion - except there's much more diesel than steam!
[26] Taplow-Hassocks
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 55 56 [57] 58 59 ... 128
  Print  
Author Topic: Night Riviera - merged posts, ongoing discussion  (Read 895827 times)
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8647



View Profile
« Reply #840 on: June 18, 2015, 05:53:42 »

Ouch.........nice lie-in for some I guess.


23:45 London Paddington to Penzance due 07:53

This train has been delayed from London Paddington and is now 205 minutes late.
This is due to a train fault.
Logged
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #841 on: June 18, 2015, 10:12:44 »

Only an hour late in the end
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8647



View Profile
« Reply #842 on: June 18, 2015, 10:59:40 »

Yes I saw that it had made up time, missed out most of the smaller Cornish stations too which helped - any idea what the problem was?
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19310



View Profile
« Reply #843 on: June 18, 2015, 12:02:36 »

There was a defect with one of the sleeper berth carriages. The set had to return empty to Old Oak to shunt out the defective carriage.

Less of a lie-in for passengers, more like very late to bed.
« Last Edit: June 18, 2015, 12:07:49 by bignosemac » Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
Kernow Otter
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 273



View Profile
« Reply #844 on: June 18, 2015, 14:42:24 »

Yes I saw that it had made up time, missed out most of the smaller Cornish stations too which helped - any idea what the problem was?

Helped who exactly?  Presumably not those who rely on the sleeper stopping at the smaller Cornish Stations to get to work.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8647



View Profile
« Reply #845 on: June 18, 2015, 14:48:57 »

Yes I saw that it had made up time, missed out most of the smaller Cornish stations too which helped - any idea what the problem was?

Helped who exactly?  Presumably not those who rely on the sleeper stopping at the smaller Cornish Stations to get to work.

Sorry I mean it "helped" the sleeper make up time........I should have used inverted commas first time around!  Smiley
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19310



View Profile
« Reply #846 on: July 22, 2015, 08:30:09 »

Up Sleeper loco failed between Bodmin Parkway and Liskeard last night. 57604 Pendennis Castle was the errant loco.

Back to back HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) power cars were sent from Laira to rescue the set. Arrived Liskeard 160 late.

Passengers woken and detrained at Plymouth and transferred to a HST for onward travel to London. Stops at Totnes, Newton Abbot and Taunton were omitted. Arrived Paddington 50 late.

As a consequence of substituting the Up Sleeper with a HST set the 0712 Taunton - London Paddington via stations to Bristol TM (Train Manager, or Ticket Machine, or Temple Meads (Bristol), depending on context) was cancelled.
« Last Edit: July 22, 2015, 08:43:18 by bignosemac » Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10242



View Profile
« Reply #847 on: July 22, 2015, 08:43:21 »

As a result the 07:12 from Taunton to London Paddington was cancelled as the HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) set had been used for the sleeper.
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3571

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #848 on: July 22, 2015, 16:57:48 »

Read on Facebook that an electrical fire was the cause.

57605 is also due to return to OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)) from Derby this week following its refit.
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3571

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #849 on: July 23, 2015, 06:35:13 »

The up sleeper failed again last night, loss of lighting in the carriages. Currently in platform 7 at Plymouth as at 0615 this morning. Believe passengers got a HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) again.
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #850 on: July 23, 2015, 06:43:28 »

Which once again appears to have affected the 07:12 from Taunton
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8647



View Profile
« Reply #851 on: July 23, 2015, 08:56:16 »

The up sleeper failed again last night, loss of lighting in the carriages. Currently in platform 7 at Plymouth as at 0615 this morning. Believe passengers got a HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) again.

............that'll be a few more customers choosing to drive/fly from Newquay in future then?
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5680



View Profile
« Reply #852 on: July 23, 2015, 14:04:33 »

This is a very poor performance indeed.
Any reasonable person would accept that things go wrong, but it really should not be happening this often.

Is the great re-branding just cosmetic WRT ('with regard to' ) the sleeper ? or will it include things like engines that can make it all the way regularly.

With the SETs (Super Express Train (now IET)) soon to replace some of the HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) on daytime services, perhaps it might be worth considering use of HST power cars on the sleeper instead of conventional locomotives.
This is a non trivial alteration on account of the different electrical systems, but it might be worth re wiring sleeper stock so as to utilise 3 phase auxiliary power as produced by HSTs
Having a standard power car at each end would avoid the time taken in detaching and coupling an engine as at present, and would permit of easy reversals en-route when engineering work requires this.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10458


View Profile
« Reply #853 on: July 23, 2015, 16:24:22 »

A costly and short-term solution I'd have thought?  Better to lease/buy some Class 68s, which seem to be settling in quite well on Chiltern?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5680



View Profile
« Reply #854 on: July 23, 2015, 16:37:20 »

A costly and short-term solution I'd have thought?  Better to lease/buy some Class 68s, which seem to be settling in quite well on Chiltern?

Possibly, my suggestion is by no means the only option and yours might be a better choice, doing nothing is not a realistic option.
HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) power cars should be affordable when fewer are required for day services, but new 68s might be better still.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 55 56 [57] 58 59 ... 128
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page