Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:55 02 May 2025
 
- Activists say ship aiming to sail to Gaza was attacked by drones
- Trump disliked Trudeau. Here's why Carney may fare better
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 tomorrow - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
2nd May (1859)
Royal Albert Bridge opens

Train RunningCancelled
17:34 London Paddington to Hereford
18:26 Exmouth to Paignton
18:50 Paignton to Exeter St Davids
18:51 Evesham to Oxford
Short Run
15:50 Penzance to Gloucester
17:26 Exmouth to Paignton
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury
17:56 Exmouth to Paignton
18:15 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
19:12 London Paddington to Bristol Parkway
19:51 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
20:06 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa
20:10 Gloucester to Bristol Temple Meads
21:00 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Shrub Hill
Delayed
An additional bus service has been planned to operate as shown 18:13 Chippenham to Westbury
18:18 Carmarthen to London Paddington
An additional bus service has been planned to operate as shown 18:37 Westbury to Chippenham
An additional bus service has been planned to operate as shown 19:14 Chippenham to Westbury
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 19:35 Westbury to Salisbury
19:48 London Paddington to Swansea
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 21:16 Bristol Parkway to Bristol Temple Meads
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 21:52 Gloucester to Worcester Shrub Hill
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 02, 2025, 19:00:03 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[123] In memory of the Weymouth Harbour Tramway on the anniversary o...
[57] Steam excursion - except there's much more diesel than steam!
[53] Taplow-Hassocks
[52] 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[38] Bath Spa station - dealing with future capacity issues - ideas...
[36] Low passenger numbers due to train unreliability
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Light fine for Network rail after Acton rail crash  (Read 4794 times)
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19588



View Profile Email
« on: December 04, 2011, 20:45:58 »

From the Ealing Gazette:

Quote
Network Rail has been fined ^20,000 after a string of blunders that led to a high speed crash in Acton.

Judge Richard McGregor-Johnson said it was only good fortune that no-one was killed when a First Great Western train travelling from Reading to Paddington ploughed into grinding trolleys parked on a working line outside West Acton station.

Workers had been drafted in to repair sections of track along the line in the early hours of June 24, 2008, Isleworth Crown Court was told on Thursday (Dec 1).

But the men, from the Reading depot, were unfamiliar with area and were confused because they had been given the wrong information about the entry point.

Camraj Bacman, Danny Burgoyne and Trevor Elliott were amongst a team which accessed the line from Noel Road, Acton, instead of nearby Longfield Road, just 100 yards further away.

Prosecutor Mark Watson, said: "They mistakenly believed they were in an isolated part of the track."

Mr Watson said there had been 'no explanation' as to why the men had not been informed of the correct access point.

At 1.07am the train driver, travelling at 50mph, spotted the trolleys on the line and slammed on the brakes, but could not avoid colliding with them.

The workmen ran to safety but the train was severely damaged. None of the passengers were injured but had to be evacuated.

Mr Watson said the system of works was not properly checked before the job went ahead.

The company apologised for what it said was a lapse in an otherwise good safety record. It has since taken steps to address the issues that arose from the accident and asked not to be fined too heavily because it is funded by the government and rail fares, and losses would impact on its ability to do necessary works.

Network Rail admitted breaching safety regulations and was fined ^20,000 and ordered to pay ^9,000 costs.
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2011, 14:45:17 »

Don't remember this one did it make the Nationals?
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19310



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2011, 16:18:38 »

Don't know about press coverage, but here's the full report from the RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch):

http://www.raib.gov.uk/publications/investigation_reports/reports_2009/report152009.cfm
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
phile
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1382

Language spoken Welsh as well as English


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2011, 20:47:34 »

Less money for Network to invest so the travelling public are the ones to be penalised at the end of the day.
No bonuses for the highest paid bosses.   Wait and see !!!
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19588



View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: December 05, 2011, 20:52:46 »

Well, that may be why the fine was so 'light':

Quote
The company apologised for what it said was a lapse in an otherwise good safety record. It has since taken steps to address the issues that arose from the accident and asked not to be fined too heavily because it is funded by the government and rail fares, and losses would impact on its ability to do necessary works.

As to whether there may be any impact on the bonuses of those at the top - well, as you say, we'll just have to wait and see.  Lips sealed
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19310



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 05, 2011, 21:05:40 »

Fining Network Rail is rather an exercise in robbing Peter to pay Paul.

More accountability should fall on the heads of senior management. It's only in cases of death or serious injury that you tend to read of charges brought against individuals. If there is to be a bonus system in place then perhaps legislation needs to made to allow for withholding some or all of those bonuses when it is proved that fault lies with management and/or the chain of command.
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4532


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 05, 2011, 22:52:06 »

Fining Network Rail is rather an exercise in robbing Peter to pay Paul.

More accountability should fall on the heads of senior management. It's only in cases of death or serious injury that you tend to read of charges brought against individuals. If there is to be a bonus system in place then perhaps legislation needs to made to allow for withholding some or all of those bonuses when it is proved that fault lies with management and/or the chain of command.

As NR» (Network Rail - home page) is a not for dividend company with profit plough back into the company fines only actually take away from investment also any fines do come out of Network Rail's profit which and is also where the bonus is paid from, fines do hit the bonus; but like all things that are unfair in the world the executive bonus is hit proportionally less
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page